Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-03

OSHA Inspection: RLI LOGISTICS SOLUTIONS

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of RLI LOGISTICS SOLUTIONS in 438 N TAYMAN ST, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78226 (NAICS 488210). OSHA activity number 339437600.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch RLI Logistics Solutions for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for RLI Logistics Solutions is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
438 N TAYMAN ST
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
78226
Mailing
438 N TAYMAN ST, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78226
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
488210
Employees
52
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2014
Abate by
Jun 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,925 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition:         Frac Sand unload Area:  on or about October 23, 2013, employees were exposed to the hazard of blowing Frac sand containing silica from spilled sand throughout the area that the employer has not ensured is cleaned up in a timely manner while employees unload railcars.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1925
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.133 A03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2014
Abate by
Mar 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,925 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.133(a)(3): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee, who wore prescription lenses while engaged in operations that involved eye hazards, used protection that incorporated the prescription in its design, or wore eye protection over the prescription glasses or protective lenses with side shields:         RLI Rail Yard, On or about October 25, 2013, an employee was exposed to the eye hazard of blowing dust containing silica sand without wearing safety glasses over prescription eye wear or safety glasses incorporating the prescription.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1925
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,540 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:         RLI rail yard, On or about October 23, 2103, an employee was operating a TCM fork truck, SN A30K00430 with an expired operator certification from a previous employer.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1540
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 55 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,695 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):  Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:         RLI Rail Yard, On or about October 23, 2013 and at time prior thereto, employees were unloading silica sand from rail cars via a conveyor system to commercial 18 wheeler sand trucks or open bed trucks without being trained on the hazards of silica.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2695
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 55 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2014
Abate by
Mar 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $385 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:         RLI Rail Yards, On or about October 25, 2013, employees were required to wear 3M half face tight fitting respirators within 10 to 15 feet of Frac sand being unloaded from rail cars to commercial sand trucks and the employer did not establish a written respiratory protection program or implemented any of the provisions of a program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $385
  • · Z (O) $700

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339437600.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.