Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: DDA CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Fatality or catastrophe inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a fatality or catastrophe safety inspection of DDA CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 254 B EAST BOUDREAUX LANE, FRANKLIN, LA 70538 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 339439663.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch DDA Construction, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for DDA Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
254 B EAST BOUDREAUX LANE
City
FRANKLIN
State
LA
ZIP
70538
Mailing
10320 HWY 182, GARDEN CITY, LA 70540
Inspection type
Fatality or catastrophe (M)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238120
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2014
Abate by
Mar 29, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $5,600 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(i): Each employee on walking/working surfaces was not protected from falling through holes (including skylights), more than six feet (1.8 m) above lower levels, by personal fall arrest systems, covers, or guardrail systems erected around such holes.    On or about 10/22/2013, at the Port of St. Mary, the employer did not ensure that guards were installed to prevent a thirty foot fall through the skylights.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $5600
  • · Z (S) $7000

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2014
Abate by
Mar 29, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $5,600 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system.  Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or greater in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system.    On or about 10/22/2013, at the Port of St. Mary, the employer did not ensure that fall protection was worn by the employee/s while working on a warehouse roof at an elevation of 30 ft.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $5600
  • · Z (S) $7000

1926.503 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2014
Abate by
Mar 29, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  On or about 10/23/2013, at the Port of St. Mary job site the employer did not provide adequate training to recognize particular hazards involved with working high above ground.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $7000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339439663.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.