MILWAUKEE, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL USA, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL USA, LLC in 2733 WEST CARMEN AVENUE, MILWAUKEE, WI 53209 (NAICS 321912). OSHA activity number 339442949.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL USA, LLC
- Site address
- 2733 WEST CARMEN AVENUE
- City
- MILWAUKEE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53209
- Mailing
- 2733 WEST CARMEN AVENUE, MILWAUKEE, WI 53209
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 321912
- Employees
- 40
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
13 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary conditions: (a) In the blasting area, floor surfaces around and behind the sandblaster(s) were not free from dust accumulating from sandblasting operations. (b) In the production department adjacent to the blasting area, extension cords were left lying on the floor in aisleways where employees walk.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1500
- · Z (S) $2700
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment: (a) In the production area, such as but not limited to the injection molding and sandblasting areas, eye protection was not required and utilized when working with machinery that generated flying particles.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1500
- · Z (S) $2700
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): (a) The employer has not performed and certified a written hazard assessment to determine which hazards will require the use of personal protective equipment, such as but not limited to safety glasses.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 10, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $4,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: (a) The employer did not develop a program to address the control of hazardous energy when performing maintenance and/or servicing work (e.g. changing dies in injection molding machines).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $4000
- · Z (S) $6300
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: (a) The employer did not develop and document lockout/tagout procedures to control hazardous energy when performing maintenance and/or servicing work (e.g. changing dies in injection molding machines).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 10, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees: (a) The employer did not provide lockout/tagout training to ensure that employees understood their specific responsibilities during maintenance and/or servicing activities (e.g. setup and die changes in the injection molding machinery).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $6300
1910.178 A04
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval: (a) In the back mold room, the stand-up Raymond electric fork truck had 1 inch holes in the forks. A written approval from the manufacturer was not obtained prior to placing chains and hooks through these holes to move molds and dies.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1500
- · Z (S) $2700
1910.303 B01
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1): Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: (a) In the molding room on the Cincinnati Milacron injection molding machine, a metallic outlet box had a plug prong broken off in it, exposing energized parts to employees working in the area. (b) In the sandblasting area, temporary wiring was used in lieu of permanent wiring. The Maxess floor fan and an mp3 player cord were plugged into an extension cord powered by another extension cord plugged into a metallic utility box.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2500
- · Z (S) $3600
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) The employer did not develop and implement a hazard communication program for employees to understand chemical hazards in the workplace. Employees work with chemicals such as but not limited to brown aluminum oxide which contains crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1500
- · Z (S) $2700
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (a) The employer did not provide information and training on the hazards of chemicals in the workplace. Employees work with chemicals, such as but not limited to brown aluminum oxide as sandblasting media.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.37 A04
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(4): Safeguard(s) designed to protect employees during an emergency (e.g., sprinkler systems, alarm systems, fire doors, exit lighting), were not in proper working order at all times: (a) In the back molding room, the emergency lights near the overhead crane were damaged and not functional. The employer did not ensure they were repaired after being struck by the overhead crane.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.134 C02 I
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible: (a) The employer did not provide training on the information contained in Appendix D of the Respiratory Protection Standard to those employees who voluntarily used N-95 particulate masks to clean sandblasting equipment.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l): (a) A certification of fork truck operator training had not been performed prior to the completion of the program.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 321912)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339442949.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.