AUBURN, NY —
OSHA Inspection: GLEASON-AVERY
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GLEASON-AVERY in 45 AURELIUS AVENUE, AUBURN, NY 13021 (NAICS 335312). OSHA activity number 339443020.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GLEASON-AVERY
- Site address
- 45 AURELIUS AVENUE
- City
- AUBURN
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 13021
- Mailing
- 45 AURELIUS AVENUE, AUBURN, NY 13021
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 335312
- Employees
- 35
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
17 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.107 B09
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(9): A clear space of not less than 3 feet on all sides was not kept free from storage or combustible construction: a) Spray Booth Area, on or about 10/24/2013: Minimum clearance was not kept on the sides of the spray booth, employee was spraying flammable paint.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.107 C02
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(2): 29 CFR 1910.107(c)(2): Open flame or spark producing equipment was within a spraying area and/or within 20 feet thereof, was not separated by a partition: a) Spray Booth Area, on or about 10/24/2013: Employees were using Bench Press and Drill Press capable of producing sparks in the Spray Booth area.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.107 C06
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(6): Electrical wiring, motors, and other equipment outside of but within twenty (20) feet of any spray area, and not separated therefrom by partitions, produced sparks under normal operating conditions and did not otherwise conform to the provisions of subpart S of this part for Class I, Division 2 Hazardous Locations: a) Spray Booth Area, on or about 10/24/2013: Duplex receptacle box not adequate for the location. b) Spray Booth Area, on or about 10/24/2013: Exhaust fan motor not adequate for the location. c) Spray Booth Area, on or about 10/24/2013: Florescent Lamps not adequate for the location.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment: a) Throughout the Facility, on or about 10/24/2013: The employer had not performed a hazard assessment to protect employees from hazards that can be prevented by the use of personal protective equipment.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $1400
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: a) Sub Assembly Area, on or about 10/24/2013: Employee was exposed to flying particles when boring metal without adequate eye protection. b) Sub Assembly Area, on or about 10/24/2013: Employee was exposed to flying particles when cutting wire leads without adequate eye protection. c) Sub Assembly Area, on or about 10/24/2013: Employee was exposed to injurious light radiation when welding without adequate eye protection. d) Warehouse Area, on or about 10/24/2013: Employee was exposed to corrosives when adding water to batteries without adequate eye protection.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.136 A
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.136(a): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses protective footwear when working in areas where there is a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, and where such employee's feet are exposed to electrical hazards: a) Warehouse Area, on or about 10/24/2013: Employee was carrying wire spools without safety shoes, exposing employee to a struck by hazard.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) At the Facility, on or about 10/24/2013: The employer had not developed a respiratory protection program, employee was mixing and spraying paint.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $1400
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. Note: The employer may discontinue an employee medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator. a) At the Facility, on or about 10/24/2013: The employer had not provided medical evaluation to employees, employee was mixing and spraying paint.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K01
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide respirator training that would ensure each employee could demonstrate knowledge of items in section (i)-(vii): a) At the Facility, on or about 10/24/2013: Employee was spraying and mixing paint with a respirator not adequate for the purpose.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L04 I
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(i): 1910.178(l)(4)(i): The powered industrial truck operators (PITs) were not trained and evaluted once in three years. a) Warehouse Area, on or about 10/24/2013: The power industrial truck operator has not been evaluated in the last three years.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $0
- — C (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a) Sub Assembly Area, on or about 10/24/2013: Rockwell Drill Press was not provided with a guard over the rotating chuck. b) Sub Assembly Area, on or about 10/24/2013: Rivett Lathe and Grinder was not provided with a guard over the rotating chuck. c) Sub Assembly Area, on or about 10/24/2013: Le Blond lathe was not provided with a guard over the rotating chuck. d) Sub Assembly Area, on or about 10/24/2013: Two Delta Milwaukee Drill Press were not provided with a guard over the rotating chuck. e) Sub Assembly Area, on or about 10/24/2013: Kopis Machine was not provided with a guard to protect the operator from reaching the point of operation. f) Assembly Area, on or about 10/24/2013: Dayton Bench Drill was not provided with a guard over the rotating chuck. g) Gear Department, on or about 10/24/2013: Three Hardinge Lathe were not provided with a guard over the rotating chuck. h) Gear Department, on or about 10/24/2013: Two Delta Milwaukee Drill Press were not provided with a guard over the rotating chuck. i) Gear Department, on or about 10/24/2013: Six Barber Coleman Screw Machine were not provided with a guard to prevent operators from ingoing nip points. j) Gear Department, on or about 10/24/2013: South Bend Milling Machine was not provided with a guard over the rotating chuck.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $1400
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): a) Sub Assembly Area, on or about 10/24/2013: Punch Press Machine had an unguarded belt and pulley belt drive. b) Assembly Area, on or about 10/24/2013: Dayton Bench Drill had an unguarded belt and pulley belt drive.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.219 E01 I
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i): Horizontal belts which had both runs seven feet or less from the floor level were not guarded with a guard that extended to at least fifteen inches above the belt: a) Assembly Area, on or about 10/24/2013: Dayton Bench Drill had an unguarded belt drive.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.219 E03 I
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i): Vertical or inclined belt(s) were not enclosed by guard(s) conforming to the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): a) Sub Assembly Area, on or about 10/24/2013: Punch Press Machine had an unguarded belt drive.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.304 G05
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent, continuous, and effective: a) Assembly Area, on or about 10/24/2013: Metal fan cord plug ground conductor missing was missing not maintaining a continuous path to ground.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $1050
- — C (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) Throughout the Facility, on or about 10/24/2013: The employer did not developed a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $1400
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) Throughout the Facility, on or about 10/24/2013: The employer had not trained his employees on hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Gleason-Avery
View Gleason-Avery's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 335312)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339443020.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.