BOW, NH ·
OSHA Inspection: MANLEAU, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MANLEAU, INC. in 7 TALLWOOD DR., BOW, NH 03304 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 339449241.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MANLEAU, INC.
- Site address
- 7 TALLWOOD DR.
- City
- BOW
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03304
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 4044, CONCORD, NH 03302
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236220
- Employees
- 17
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,020 · Current $510 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a. Bow, NH - The employer had not established and implemented a written site specific respiratory protection program for employees who wear required-use respirators during activities such as, but not limited to, mold remediation or clean up of sheetrock dust during fire and flood restoration at various worksites. Abatement Assistance Note: The employer shall include in the program the following provisions of this section, as applicable: Procedures for selecting respirators for use in the workplace; Medical evaluations of employees required to use respirators; Fit testing procedures for tight-fitting respirators; Procedures for proper use of respirators in routine and reasonably foreseeable emergency situations; Procedures and schedules for cleaning, disinfecting, storing, inspecting, repairing, discarding, and otherwise maintaining respirators; Procedures to ensure adequate air quality, quantity, and flow of breathing air for atmosphere-supplying respirators; Training of employees in the respiratory hazards to which they are potentially exposed during routine and emergency situations; Training of employees in the proper use of respirators, including putting on and removing them, any limitations on their use, and their maintenance; and Procedures for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the program.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $510
- · Z (S) $1020
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a. Bow, NH - The employer had not provided a medical evaluation to determine the ability of production employees to wear required-use respirators for activities such as, but not limited to, mold remediation or clean up of sheetrock dust during fire and flood restoration at various worksites.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 20, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: a. Bow, NH - The employees had not been fit tested prior to initial use of respirators for activities such as, but not limited to, mold remediation or clean up of sheetrock dust during fire and flood restoration at various worksites.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.304 G05
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent, continuous, and effective: a. Warehouse, Bow, NH - Equipment ready for use by workers in the field for activities such as, but not limited to, fire and flood restoration, had missing ground pins, creating an electrical hazard for workers using this equipment. Abatement Note: All equipment (except double insulated tools) with missing ground pins must be taken out of service until repaired or replaced.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $1700
1904.4 A
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $340 · Current $170 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.4(a): The employer did not record each work-related fatality, injury or illness case that resulted in the general recording criteria on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent. a. On or about 10/29/13, the employer had not recorded the following workplace injury on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent to the calendar year 2013: An injury to an employee on 8/31/13 which required stitches was not recorded on the OSHA 300 Log for 2013. Abatement Certification and Documentation is required.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $170
- · Z (O) $340
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236220)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339449241.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.