MANCHESTER, NH ·
OSHA Inspection: FERNANDO DOMINGUEZ
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of FERNANDO DOMINGUEZ in 298 QUEEN CITY AVE, MANCHESTER, NH 03102 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 339452724.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FERNANDO DOMINGUEZ
- Site address
- 298 QUEEN CITY AVE
- City
- MANCHESTER
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03102
- Mailing
- 51 CALDWELL ROAD, NASHUA, NH 03060
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238310
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Nov 4, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 22, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): a. Site- Employees were exposed to fall, electrical, trip, and ladder hazards where the employer failed to have a competent person conduct frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.34 C
- Issued
- Nov 4, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 8, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.34(c): Means of egress was not continually maintained free of all obstructions or impediments to full instant use in the case of fire or other emergency. a. Room 521- Employees were exposed to trip hazards where the path to the exit door was obstructed with tools, materials, and debris.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.404 B01 II
- Issued
- Nov 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(ii): On a construction site, where an assured equipment grounding program was not utilized, all 120-volt, single-phase, 15 and 20 ampere receptacle outlets which were not a part of the permanent wiring of the building or structure and which are in use by employees did not have approved ground fault circuit interrupers for personal protection: a. Room 521- Employees were not protected from electric shock where an extension cord powering a circular saw was plugged into an outlet that was not protected with a ground fault circuit interrupter.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.404 F06
- Issued
- Nov 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous: a. Room 521- Employees were not protected from electric shock where an extension cord powering a circular saw was missing the ground pin.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Nov 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a. Roof- An employee working from the roof was exposed to falls of 6 feet 1 inch and approximately 50 feet where adequate fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Nov 4, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 22, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a. Roof- An employee working from the roof was exposed falls and was not provided with fall protection training from the employer.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Nov 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a. Roof- An employee using an extension ladder to access the high roof from the low roof was exposed to a fall hazard where the ladder only extended 20 inches above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
More inspections at Fernando Dominguez
View Fernando Dominguez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238310)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339452724.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.