Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT LLC

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related health inspection of ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT LLC in 120 HIGHLAND AVE, MIDDLETOWN, NY 10940 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 339452849.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Allied Construction Management LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Allied Construction Management LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
120 HIGHLAND AVE
City
MIDDLETOWN
State
NY
ZIP
10940
Mailing
35 NANCY DR, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06604
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2013
Abate by
Jan 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): In the workplace where respirators were necessary to protect the health of the employee or where respirators were required by the employer, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures for selecting respirators for use in the workplace:        a). On or about 10/29/13, at 120 Highland Ave, Middletown, NY 10940, on the 2nd floor, for employees removing ceiling tiles on a building built in the late 1960's. The employer provided and required the use of 3M 1/2 mask respirators and AO safety 1/2 mask respirators. The employer did not provide a respiratory protection program to include a written program, fit tests, medical evaluations, and training.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $1250
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2013
Abate by
Jan 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a). On or about 10/29/13, at 120 Highland Ave, Middletown, NY 10940, on the 2nd floor, for employees removing ceiling tiles on a building built in the late 1960's. The employer provided and required the use of 3M 1/2 mask respirators and AO safety 1/2 mask respirators. The employer did not provide a respiratory protection program to include medical evaluations.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2013
Abate by
Jan 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator is fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter:  a). On or about 10/29/13, at 120 Highland Ave, Middletown, NY 10940, on the 2nd floor, for employees removing ceiling tiles on a building built in the late 1960's. The employer provided and required the use of 3M 1/2 mask respirators and AO safety 1/2 mask respirators. The employer did not provide a respiratory protection program to include fit tests.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2013
Abate by
Jan 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide effective training to employees who are required to use respirators. The training was not comprehensive, understandable, and did not recur annually, and more often if necessary:   a). On or about 10/29/13, at 120 Highland Ave, Middletown, NY 10940, on the 2nd floor, for employees removing ceiling tiles on a building built in the late 1960's. The employer provided and required the use of 3M 1/2 mask respirators and AO safety 1/2 mask respirators. The employer did not provide a respiratory protection program to include training.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 F02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2013
Abate by
Jan 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,250 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(2)(i): Each employer who has a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not ensure that a "competent person" conducts an exposure assessment immediately before or at the initiation of the operation to ascertain expected exposures during that operation or workplace:     a). On or about 10/29/13, at 120 Highland Ave, Middletown, NY 10940, on the 2nd floor, for employees removing ceiling tiles on a building built in the late 1960's. The employer did not conduct an initial asbestos assessment prior to the start of the project. CSHO bulk sampling, from a removed ceiling tile, resulted to 10% asbestos on the site.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $1250
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2013
Abate by
Jan 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,250 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met:     a). On or about 10/29/13, at 120 Highland Ave, Middletown, NY 10940, on the 2nd floor, for employees removing ceiling tiles on a building built in the late 1960's. The employees worked around insultaion pipes that possibly contain ACM. The employer did not implement a hazard communication program to include the hazards associated with exposure to asbestos. CSHO bulk sampling, from a removed ceiling tile, resulted to 10% asbestos on the site.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (O) $1250
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2013
Abate by
Jan 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area:      a). On or about 10/29/13, at 120 Highland Ave, Middletown, NY 10940, on the 2nd floor, for employees removing ceiling tiles on a building built in the late 1960's. The employees worked around insultaion pipes that possibly contain ACM. The employer did not implement a hazard communication program to include training on the hazards associated with exposure to asbestos. CSHO bulk sampling, from a removed ceiling tile, resulted to 10% asbestos on the site.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (O) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.100 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2013
Abate by
Dec 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $250 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    a). On or about 10/29/13, at 120 Highland Ave, Middletown, NY 10940, on the 2nd floor, for employees removing ceiling tiles. The employer did not provide and require the use of hard hats.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (O) $250
  • — C (O) $400
  • — Z (O) $400

View Allied Construction Management LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339452849.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.