Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ADVANCED STEEL TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of ADVANCED STEEL TECHNOLOGY, INC. in 300 WEST HERMITAGE RD. NE, ROME, GA 30161 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 339453540.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Advanced Steel Technology, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Advanced Steel Technology, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
300 WEST HERMITAGE RD. NE
City
ROME
State
GA
ZIP
30161
Mailing
300 WEST HERMITAGE RD NE, ROME, GA 30161
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
158
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 I01 II C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2014
Abate by
Feb 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0560

29 CFR 1910.134(i)(1)(ii)(C): Breathing air did not meet requirements for Grade D breathing air as described in the ANSI/Compressed Gas Association Commodity Specification G-7.1-1989:  (a) Abrasive Blasting area, Building C- The employer did not ensure that the compressed air supplied from an oil lubricated compressor to an abrasive-blasting respirator was at least Grade D breathing air quality. The employer's continuous carbon monoxide monitoring device was reading 15 parts per million (PPM).  Grade D breathing air must contain 10 parts per million or less carbon monoxide per the ANSI/Compressed Gas Association Commodity Specification for Air, G-7.1-1989.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.134 K01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2014
Abate by
Feb 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0560

29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(vii): The employer did not ensure that each user could demonstrate knowledge of the general requirements of 29 CFR 1910.134:  (a) Abrasive Blasting area, Building C- Employees required to wear an air supplied abrasive-blasting respirator were not told the specifications of Grade D breathing air, including the acceptable level of carbon monoxide. The employer's continuous carbon monoxide monitoring device was reading 15 parts per million (PPM).  Grade D breathing air must contain 10 parts per million or less carbon monoxide per 1910.134(i)(1)(ii)(C) and the ANSI/Compressed Gas Association Commodity Specification for Air, G-7.1-1989.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2014
Abate by
Feb 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(1): The employer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if any spaces were permit-required confined spaces:  (a) Production area- The employer did not ensure that all permit required confined spaces were properly evaluated and identified, including but not limited to, the pit located under the BS3 machine. The BS3 machine was not listed in the companys written confined space entry policy procedure program as one of their identified spaces.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.146 C04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2014
Abate by
Feb 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4): When the employer decided that its employees would enter permit spaces, the employer did not develop and implement a written permit space entry program that complied with 29 CFR 1910.146:  (a) Production area- The employers written confined space entry policy procedure program did not reflect current workplace conditions. Examples include, but are not limited to, confined spaces listed that no longer exist and permit required confined spaces listed as being entered that are no longer entered. The program also contained requirements to sample for oxygen in some instances even though the companys air monitoring equipment is only capable of sampling for combustible gases. It also referenced rescue equipment such as harnesses, lifelines and retrieval rescue tripods that the company does not own.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Advanced Steel Technology, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339453540.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.