MACON, GA ·
OSHA Inspection: TRIMX INTERNATIONAL
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of TRIMX INTERNATIONAL in 2730 WEAVER RD., MACON, GA 31217 (NAICS 423930). OSHA activity number 339454522.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TRIMX INTERNATIONAL
- Site address
- 2730 WEAVER RD.
- City
- MACON
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 31217
- Mailing
- 2730 WEAVER RD., MACON, GA 31217
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423930
- Employees
- 13
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
10731377
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: On or about October 31, 2013: Employees were required to wear 3M full face respirators while spraying isocyanates on the roof of the building. The employer did not ensure a written respiratory protection program was developed and implemented.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $720
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
10731377
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: On or about October 31, 2013: Employees were required to wear 3M full face respirators while spraying isocyanates on the roof of the building. The employer did not ensure employees required to wear respirators completed a medical evaluation prior to respirator use.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
10731377
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: On or about October 31, 2013: Employees were required to wear 3M full face respirators while spraying isocyanates on the roof of the building. The employer did not ensure employees were fit tested prior to respirator use.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
10731377
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: On or about October 31, 2013: Employees were required to wear 3M full face respirators while spraying isocyanates on the roof of the building. The employer did not ensure employees shaved prior to respirator use.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $720
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.134 G01 I B
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
10731377
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(B): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees with a condition that interfered with the face-to-facepiece seal or valve function: On or about October 31, 2013: Employees were required to wear 3M full face respirators while spraying isocyanates on the roof of the building. The employer did not ensure employees did not wear items that prevented the face-to-facepiece seal.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 K01 IV
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
10731377
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(iv): The employer did not ensure that each user could demonstrate knowledge of how to inspect, put on, remove, use, and check the seals of the respirator: On or about October 31, 2013: Employees were required to wear 3M full face respirators while spraying isocyanates on the roof of the building. The employer did not ensure employees were trained to be able to perform seal checks when donning respirators.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 26, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about October 31, 2013: Employees spraying isocyanates onto the roof of the building were exposed to inhalation of isocyanates and skin contact hazards. The employer failed to ensure a hazard communication program was developed and implemented prior to chemical use.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H02 III
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 26, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
10731377
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2)(iii): The employer did not provide information to the employees as to the location and availability of the written hazard communication program, and material safety data sheets required by 29 CFR 1910.1200: On or about October 31, 2013: Employees spraying isocyanates onto the roof of the building were exposed to inhalation of isocyanates and skin contact hazards. The employer failed to ensure all employees were aware of the location of safety data sheets at the worksite.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at Trimx International
View Trimx International's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423930)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339454522.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.