Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: LEACH GARNER

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of LEACH GARNER in 49 PEARL STREET, ATTLEBORO, MA 02703 (NAICS 331491). OSHA activity number 339456170.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Leach Garner for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Leach Garner is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LEACH GARNER
Site address
49 PEARL STREET
City
ATTLEBORO
State
MA
ZIP
02703
Mailing
49 PEARL STREET, ATTLEBORO, MA 02703
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
331491
Employees
200
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,251 · Current $2,276 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floor(s) or platform(s) 4 feet (1.22 m) or more above the adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded by standard railings (or the equivalent as specified in 29 CFR 1910.23(e)(3)(i) through (v)), on all open sides:  Billet Room: Workers exposed to a 9 foot fall from work platform to ground level. Platform was not fully guarded with standard guardrails.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2275.7
  • · Z (S) $3251

1910.134 A01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2014
Abate by
Aug 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,060 · Current $2,142 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(a)(1): When effective engineering controls were not feasible or while they were being instituted, appropriate respirators were not used pursuant to the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.134:  Melting Department: Respiratory protection during melting and pouring operations was not worn where workers were exposed to silver fume in excess of the permissible exposure limit of .01mg/m3.   SEE CITATION 1 ITEM 2b FOR EXPOSURE INFORMATION   Provide OSHA with monthly updates of efforts to reduce exposures below the permissible exposure limit.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2142
  • · Z (S) $3060

1910.1000 A02

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2014
Abate by
Aug 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2): Employee(s) were exposed to an airborne concentration of silver fume listed in Table Z-1 in excess of the 8 hour Time Weighted Average concentration of .01mg/m3:  a) On 2-20-14,  A worker was exposed to an 8 hour time weighted average of .086 mg/m3 of silver fume during melting and pouring operations.   b) On 2-20-14, A worker was exposed to an 8 hour time weighted average of .19mg/m3 of silver fume during melting and pouring operations.   c) On 2-20-14., A worker was exposed to an 8 hour time weighted average of .09 mg/m3 of silver fume during melting and pouring operations.    Provide OSHA with monthly updates on efforts to reduce exposures below the permissible exposure limt.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1000 E

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2014
Abate by
Mar 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d):  Melting Department:  Workers were exposed to silver fume during continuous casting melting and pouring operations in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of .01mg/m3. Mechanical ventilation was not adequate to reduce airborne levels below the PEL.    SEE CITATION 1 ITEM 2b FOR EXPOSURE LEVELS  Provide OSHA with monthly updates on efforts to reduce exposures below the permissible exposure limit.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,060 · Current $2,142 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by the operating saw:   Casting: Unused portions of the horizontal band saw were not fully guarded  Wire Drawing: Rotating parts and in going nip points on the wire stand machines were not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2142
  • · Z (S) $3060

1910.219 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,601 · Current $1,821 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): All exposed part(s) of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform were not protected by stationary casing(s) enclosing shafting completely or by trough(s) enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting:  First Floor Mill Side: Rotating shafts on the Cincinnati scalpers were not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1820.7
  • · Z (S) $2601

1910.1200 F05 II

Other-than-serious 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:  a) Scrub Line/Hot bonding: The surface cleaner tank containing sulfuric acid was not labeled with a health hazard warning.    b) Heat treating: A drum of talc was not labeled with a health hazard warning.  c) Breakdown Mills: Tank of degreaser was not labeled with health hazard warning.   d) Waste Water Treatment: Tank for cooling tower was not labeled with health hazard warning.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Leach Garner's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339456170.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.