DEDEDO, GU —
OSHA Inspection: BME & SONS, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BME & SONS, INC. in PERIMETER FENCE PROJECT OF THE JOHNNY QUINTO RESIDENCE 138 UHANG STREET, DEDEDO, GU 96929 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339459224.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BME & SONS, INC.
- Site address
- PERIMETER FENCE PROJECT OF THE JOHNNY QUINTO RESIDENCE 138 UHANG STREET
- City
- DEDEDO
- State
- GU
- ZIP
- 96929
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 24402, BARRIGADA, GU 96921
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 80
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B03
- Issued
- Feb 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,964 · Current $1,964
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(3): The use of any machinery, tool, material, or equipment which was not in compliance with any applicable requirement of this part was not prohibited. Such machine, tool, material, or equipment was not either identified as unsafe by tagging or locking the controls to render them inoperable or by physically removed from its place of operation: At the project on or about November 5, 2013, the electrical equipment, such as unmounted electrical boxes, extension cords not secured in the connectors, and equipment with no ground-fault circuit-interrupter protection, was not identified as unsafe by tagging or locking the controls to render them inoperable or by physically removed from its place of operation.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $1964
- — C (S) $1964
- — Z (S) $1964
1926.150 C01 I
- Issued
- Feb 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,964 · Current $1,964
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.150(c)(1)(i): A fire extinguisher, rated not less than 2A, was not provided for each 3,000 square feet of the protected building area, or major fraction thereof: At the project on or about November 5, 2013, and at times prior thereto, there was no fire extinguishers onsite. Onsite, there were pieces of lumber, paper and rags. Potential ignition sources included power jack hammers, defective electrical equipment, smoking, and vehicles. There were no alternate means to fight fires onsite, such as, 55 gallon drums with water and pails or hoses connected to water sources.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $1964
- — C (S) $1964
- — Z (S) $1964
1926.403 B02
- Issued
- Feb 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,964 · Current $1,964
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification: In front of the house on or about November 5, 2013, and at times prior thereto, an electrical box was not used as designed as it lay on the ground instead of being secured to a surface. The outlet in the electrical box powered a 110 VAC Hilti TE 1500 AVR jack hammer, used to break up soil.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $1964
- — C (S) $1964
- — Z (S) $1964
1926.404 B01 I
- Issued
- Feb 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,964 · Current $1,964
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): The employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites. These requirements are in addition to any other requirements for equipment grounding conductors: In front of the house on or about November 5, 2013, and at times prior thereto, there was no assured equipment grounding conductor program or ground-fault circuit-interrupter protection for employees that used a 110 VAC Hilti TE 1500 AVR jack hammer, used to break up soil. The jack hammer was powered through an extension cord connected an exterior outlet on the house.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $1964
- — C (S) $1964
- — Z (S) $1964
1926.405 B02
- Issued
- Feb 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,964 · Current $1,964
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(b)(2): All pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers. When metal covers are used, they were not grounded. In energized installations, each outlet box did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy: In front of the house on or about November 5, 2013, and at times prior thereto, there was no cover plate on a 110 VAC outlet in an electrical box on the end of an extension cord. The outlet powered a 110 VAC Hilti TE 1500 AVR jack hammer, used to break up soil.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $1964
- — C (S) $1964
- — Z (S) $1964
1926.405 G02 IV
- Issued
- Feb 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,964 · Current $1,964
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided which will prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws: In front of the house on or about November 5, 2013, and at times prior thereto, there was no strain relief for an extension cord that entered an electrical box as the outside insulation on the cord was not secured in the connector on the box. The outlet powered a 110 VAC Hilti TE 1500 AVR jack hammer, used to break up soil.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $1964
- — C (S) $1964
- — Z (S) $1964
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Feb 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,620 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer failed to initiate and maintain programs that provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment were made by competent persons designated by the employer: At the project on or about November 5, 2013, the employer failed to inspect the job site frequently and regularly or the person that inspected the site was not competent as several hazards at the project that were not in compliance with OSHA regulations, such as, but not limited to, unmounted electrical boxes, extension cords not secured in the connectors, electrical equipment with no ground-fault circuit-interrupter protection, and no fire extinguisher equipment was onsite. The BME & Sons, Incorporated was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 313859498, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on April 25, 2011, with respect to a workplace located at the Exterior Painting, Bldg. 4175, 4177, 4178, 4179, Apra Heights, Guam.
Recent events (3)
- — R (R) $0
- — C (R) $4620
- — Z (R) $4620
More inspections at BME & Sons, INC.
View BME & Sons, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in GU
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339459224.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.