Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: ALL STAR ENTERPRISES AND COLLISION CENTER, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of ALL STAR ENTERPRISES AND COLLISION CENTER, INC. in 171 BOSTON STREET, SALEM, MA 01970 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 339468050.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch ALL Star Enterprises and Collision Center, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for ALL Star Enterprises and Collision Center, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
171 BOSTON STREET
City
SALEM
State
MA
ZIP
01970
Mailing
171 BOSTON STREET, SALEM, MA 01970
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811121
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 24602590

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a) Location - Establishment:  On or about October 31, 2013, the employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program for employee required by the employer to wear respiratory protection while painting vehicles.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2400

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 043524602590T156

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) Location - Production:  On or about October 31, 2013, for employees required by the employer to wear tight fitting elastomeric air purifying respirators for specific processes, the employer did not provide the required medical evaluation.    Note:  The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 24602590T156

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  a) Location - Establishment:  On or about October 31, 2013 the employer did not conduct an evaluation of employee chemical exposure as a result of spray painting operations to air contaminants such as, but not limited to: toluene, xylene.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.1025 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 068715911592

29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2): An initial determination was not made to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level:  a) Location - Establishment:  On or about October 313, 2013, the employer did not conduct an evaluation/determination of employee respiratory exposure to lead while working with or spraying lead containing paints.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1026 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 068906910694C113

29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI):  a) Location - Production:  On or about October 31, 2013, the employer did not conduct an exposure determination for employees potentially exposed to hexavalent chromium in automotive paints during repair and spray painting operations.  The employer is to make this determination in accordance with either paragraph (d)(2), the scheduled monitoring option, or paragraph (d)(3), the performance-oriented option.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2013
Abate by
Dec 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $800 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0435068724602590T156

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a) Location - Production:  On or about October 31, 2013, for employees required by the employer to wear tight fitting elastomeric air purifying respirators for specific processes, the employer did not conduct fit testing to ensure proper protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $800
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2013
Abate by
Nov 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0435068724602590T156

29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: a) Location - Production:  On or about October 31, 2013, an employee required by the employer to wear tight fitting elastomeric air purifying respirators for specific processes had a full beard that inferred with the protective ability of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0435068724602590T156

29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide respirator training that would ensure each employee could demonstrate knowledge of items in section (i)-(vii):  a) Location - Production:  On or about October 31, 2013, for employees required by the employer to wear tight fitting elastomeric air purifying respirators for specific processes, the employer did not conduct the required training.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2000

View ALL Star Enterprises and Collision Center, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339468050.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.