BEACON FALLS, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: DIGIOVANNI & SONS CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of DIGIOVANNI & SONS CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 10 MAPLE AVE., BEACON FALLS, CT 06403 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339468589.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DIGIOVANNI & SONS CONSTRUCTION, LLC
- Site address
- 10 MAPLE AVE.
- City
- BEACON FALLS
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06403
- Mailing
- 152 CHRISTIAN ST., OXFORD, CT 06478
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii) Worksite: The metal frame scaffold platform from that an employee was required to work at a height of approximately 14 feet above the ground was not fully planked.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1120
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. Worksite: The metal frame scaffold from that the employees were working at heights up to approximately 28 feet above the ground was not erected under the supervision of a person competent in scaffold erection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.454 A01
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer failed to have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area. Worksite: The employees who were working from the metal frame scaffold without fall protection at heights up to approximately 28 feet above the ground were not trained to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Worksite: The employees who were exposed to fall hazards of above six feet while working from a low sloped roof were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. Worksite: The employees who were working from the metal frame scaffold platforms at heights up to approximately 28 feet above the ground were not protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1960
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Worksite: The employees who were working from the roof at a height of over six feet above the ground were not protected from fall hazards by the use guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.451 F06
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(6): Scaffolds were erected, used, dismantled, altered, or moved such that they, or any conductive material handled on them, could have come closer than the minimum distances established for specific voltages as set forth in the table in subparagraph (f)(6).Note: Specify distances as indicated in table in paragraph (f)(6) of this section. Worksite: The metal frame scaffold from that the employees were working was not located at least three feet from the 120/240 volt electrical power lines that were supplying power to the residence under construction.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at Digiovanni & Sons Construction, LLC
View Digiovanni & Sons Construction, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339468589.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.