Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JARVIS METALS RECYCLING INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of JARVIS METALS RECYCLING INC. in 7825 OLIVE AVENUE, LUBBOCK, TX 79408 (NAICS 423930). OSHA activity number 339470577.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jarvis Metals Recycling INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jarvis Metals Recycling INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7825 OLIVE AVENUE
City
LUBBOCK
State
TX
ZIP
79408
Mailing
7825 OLIVE AVENUE, LUBBOCK, TX 79408
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423930
Employees
52
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2014
Abate by
Nov 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent.    On or before January 8, 2014 Jarvis Metals Recycling Inc. did not administer a hearing conservation program so as to protect employees from the effects of noise while working in the shredder picking room.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (O) $1800
  • — C (S) $4900
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.110 B06 VI

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2014
Abate by
Nov 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.110(b)(6)(vi): Readily ignitable material such as weeds and long dry grass was not removed within 10 feet of any container.     On or about November 5, 2013 the employer did not ensure that ignitable material was a minimum of 10 feet from a propane tank on the west end outside the maintenance shop employees were exposing employees to fire and explosion hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $1000
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1025 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2014
Abate by
Nov 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2): An initial determination was not made to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level.    On or about November 5, 2013 the employer failed to perform an initial determination if employees were exposed to lead inhalation hazards in the metal warehouse.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $1000
  • — C (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.1025 H01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2014
Abate by
Apr 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead.  On or about November 5, 2013 employees of Jarvis Metals Recycling Inc. were exposed to lead ingestion hazard in the metal warehouse because surfaces, including but not limited to a desk and table used for consuming food and drink, were not kept clean of accumulated lead.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1025 L01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2014
Abate by
Apr 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not train each employee who was subject to exposure to lead at or above the action level, or for whom the possibility of skin or eye irritation exists, in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1025.  On or about November 5, 2013 employees working in the metal warehouse had not been trained about the hazards of lead, exposing them to ingestion hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1027 K01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2014
Abate by
Apr 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1027(k)(1): Surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of cadmium.  On or about November 5, 2013 employees in the metal warehouse were exposed ti ingestion hazards because surfaces, including but not limited to a desk and table used to consume food and drink, were contaminated with accumulations of cadmium.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1027 M04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2014
Abate by
Apr 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1027(m)(4)(i): The employer did not institute a training program for all employees who were potentially exposed to cadmium, ensure employee participation in the program, and maintain a record of the contents of such program.  On or about November 5, 2013 employees in the metal warehouse were exposed to hazards associated with cadmium.  The employer had not trained employees about cadmium hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F05 I

Other-than-serious 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2014
Abate by
Nov 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein.    On or about November 5, 2013 outside the maintenance shop employees were exposed to fire, explosion, and chemical hazards where chemical containers were not labeled as to contents in the following instances:    1) Propane tank outside the west side of the maintenance shop.    2) Propane tank outside the east side of the metals warehouse.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (O) $500
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 F06 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2014
Abate by
Nov 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical.    On or about November 5, 2013 inside the shredder tool room employees were exposed to chemical hazards where a chemical container was not labeled as to its contents.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (O) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2014
Abate by
Nov 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use.    On or about November 5, 2013 employees of Jarvis Metals Recycling Inc. were exposed to respiratory hazards due to the failure of the employer to develop and implement a written respiratory program when respirators were required for use in the shredder picking room.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (O) $0
  • — C (O) $700
  • — Z (O) $700

1910.134 D01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2014
Abate by
Apr 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(ii): The employer did not select and use a NIOSH-certified respirator in compliance with the conditions of its certification.  On or about November 5, 2013 the employer did not ensure that employees were using NIOSH approved respirators where respirators were required by the employer in the shredder picking room exposing employees to chemicals hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Jarvis Metals Recycling INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339470577.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.