OLNEY, TX —
OSHA Inspection: CEMCO INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CEMCO INC. in 782 TEXAS 251, OLNEY, TX 76374 (NAICS 333120). OSHA activity number 339471567.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CEMCO INC.
- Site address
- 782 TEXAS 251
- City
- OLNEY
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76374
- Mailing
- 782 TEXAS 251, OLNEY, TX 76374
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333120
- Employees
- 23
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures : This violation occurred on November 06, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program for employees wearing respirators to perform spraying and blasting operations in the facility.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1600
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: This violation occurred on November 06, 2013, and at times prior thereto, in the production facility, the employer did not provide medical evaluation for employees required to use respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a power industrial truck: This violation occurred on November 06, 2013, and at times prior thereto, in the manufacturing facility; employees operated Nissan forklift without first completing training consisting of a combination of formal instruction, practical training, and evaluation of his performance.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.179 L03 III D
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(l)(3)(iii)(d): Pendant control stations were not kept clean nor were function labels kept legible: This violation occurred on November 06, 2013, and at times prior thereto, in the North shop of the manufacturing plant, the pendant controls to the Shaw Box 10-ton overhead crane did not have legible function labels.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1000
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks; a) This violation occurred on November 06, 2013, and at times prior thereto, in the south shop, employees operated an 8 bench grinder with no guard over rotating parts. b) This violation occurred on November 06, 2013, and at times prior thereto, employees were operating a Central Machinery Grinder S/N 39798 with no guards in the North shop exposed to hazards associated with contacting the rotating parts of the machine.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections at Cemco INC.
View Cemco INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333120)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339471567.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.