Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MARK HILL CONSTRUCTION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARK HILL CONSTRUCTION in 801 POLARIS PARKWAY, COLUMBUS, OH 43240 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339477408.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mark Hill Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mark Hill Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
801 POLARIS PARKWAY
City
COLUMBUS
State
OH
ZIP
43240
Mailing
3258 COUNTY ROAD 166, CARDINGTON, OH 43315
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 10 3 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2013
Abate by
Dec 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $6,160 · Current $6,160
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a. In section A2/A3 of the south courtyard where an employee was working on the unprotected balcony of the third floor, fall protection was not used, thereby exposing employees to a 21 foot fall hazard.  b. In section A2/B1 south side of the garage where employees were installing floor decking for the third floor, fall protection was not used, thereby exposing the employees to a 20 foot fall hazard.  c. In section A1 of the clubhouse where employees were installing floor decking for the third floor, fall protection was not used, thereby exposing the employees to a 22 foot fall hazard.   MARK HILL CONSTRUCTION DBA Mega Framing was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 313155467, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on August 27, 2010, with respect to a workplace located at 147 Split Log Pass, Lewis Center, OH 43026
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $6160

1926.503 C03

Repeat Gravity 1 3 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2013
Abate by
Dec 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,640 · Current $2,640
1926.503(c) "Retraining." When the employer has reason to believe that any affected employee who has already been trained does not have the understanding and skill required by paragraph (a) of this section, the employer shall retrain each such employee. Circumstances where retraining is required include, but are not limited to, situations where:  29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3): Inadequacies in an affected employee's knowledge or use of fall protection systems or equipment indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite understanding or skill. Note: The following appendices to subpart M of this part serve as non-mandatory guidelines to assist employers in complying with the appropriate requirements of subpart M of this part. [59 FR 40738, Aug. 9, 1994; 60 FR 5131, Jan. 26, 1995]  a. In section A2/A3 of the south courtyard where employees were working on the unprotected balcony of the third floor, employees did not understand the requirements for individual fall protection equipment and had not been retrained, thereby exposing employees to a 21 foot fall hazard.  b. In section A2/B1 south side of the garage where employees were installing floor decking for the third floor, employees did not understand the requirements for individual fall protection equipment and had not been retrained, thereby exposing the employees to a 20 foot fall hazard.  c. In section A1 of the clubhouse where employees were installing floor decking for the third floor, employees did not understand the requirements for individual fall protection equipment and had not been retrained, thereby exposing the employees to a 22 foot fall hazard.   MARK HILL CONSTRUCTION DBA Mega Framing was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 313155467, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on August 27, 2010, with respect to a workplace located at 147 Split Log Pass, Lewis Center, OH 43026
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $2640

View Mark Hill Construction's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339477408.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.