Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,288Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-24 Last loaded 2026-07-29

OSHA Inspection: EMERSON GRINDING COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of EMERSON GRINDING COMPANY in 1489 KELLY AVE., AKRON, OH 44306 (NAICS 561990). OSHA activity number 339478133.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Emerson Grinding Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Emerson Grinding Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1489 KELLY AVE.
City
AKRON
State
OH
ZIP
44306
Mailing
1489 KELLY AVE., AKRON, OH 44306
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
561990
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 26, 2013
Abate by
Dec 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):  The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    On or about November 14, 2013, the employer had not conducted an appropriate evaluation of the workers who are allowed to operate the powered industrial vehicle(s) in use within the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 26, 2013
Abate by
Dec 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii):  The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, were not guarded:    On or about November 14, 2013, the band saw in use in upper processing area did not have the unused portion of the blade guarded as required.  The materials being cut were approximately 2 to 3 inches high, while the exposed portion of the blade was approximately 30 inches.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1904.29 A

Other-than-serious 5 instances 25 exposed
Issued
Nov 26, 2013
Abate by
Dec 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(a):  OSHA form 300, or its equivalent, were not maintained on site as required:    On or about November 14, 2013, the OSHA form 300 or its equivalent was not maintained on site as required for calendar years 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, and current year 2013.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $400

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 26, 2013
Abate by
Dec 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):   The required workplace hazard assessment was not certified as being performed, identifying the person completing the assessment, and written certification of the date of the assessment:  On or about November 14, 2014, the workplace assessment, designed to identify personal protective equipment (PPE) needed by employees to prevent injury, was not performed.     NOTE:  The assessment shall be written, titled, dated and certified by signature.  The required documented training shall include the following:    1)      When PPE is necessary; 2)      What PPE is necessary; 3)      Limitations of the PPE; 4)      How to properly wear and use the PPE, and  5)      Inspection and care of the PPE.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 26, 2013
Abate by
Dec 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i):  The employer did not provide Appendix D of this section when respirators are provided for use on site:  On or about November 14, 2013, the employer had not provided the information as required for the full face tight fitting respirators in use in the processing areas.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 C02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 26, 2013
Abate by
Dec 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii):  The employer did not establish and implement elements of a written respiratory protection program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily is medically able to use that respirator and that the respirator is cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:  On or about November 14, 2013, the employer had not established the program as required for the workers provided the full face tight fitting respirators in use in the processing areas.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339478133.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.