GAINESVILLE, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: HOLT PROFESSIONAL, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HOLT PROFESSIONAL, INC. in 7874 SW 82ND AVENUE, GAINESVILLE, FL 32608 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339482721.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HOLT PROFESSIONAL, INC.
- Site address
- 7874 SW 82ND AVENUE
- City
- GAINESVILLE
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32608
- Mailing
- 6007 S. CR 325, HAWTHORNE, FL 32640
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Nov 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a. On or about November 13, 2013, two employees using Hitachi NR83A2 pneumatic air nail guns were not wearing safety glasses, exposing themselves to being hit by nails or flying debris.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1440
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. On or about November 13, 2013, on a 6:12 pitch roof, three employees performing roofing operations were not protected from a 10 feet 4-inch fall hazard by use of a guardrail system, safety net system, personal fall arrest system or any alternative fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1440
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Nov 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to upper landing surfaces, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladders were used to gain access. a. On or about Novemeber 13, 2013, employees used a Werner extension ladder to access and egress a roof, that did not extend 3 feet over the eave, exposing employees to a 10-foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1440
- · Z (S) $2400
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339482721.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.