DAYTONA BEACH, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: AMERICANO BEACH RESORT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AMERICANO BEACH RESORT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP in 1260 N ATLANTIC AVE, DAYTONA BEACH, FL 32118 (NAICS 713990). OSHA activity number 339488777.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AMERICANO BEACH RESORT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Site address
- 1260 N ATLANTIC AVE
- City
- DAYTONA BEACH
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32118
- Mailing
- 1260 N ATLANTIC AVE, DAYTONA BEACH, FL 32118
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 713990
- Employees
- 18
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Nov 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $1,360
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets. a. On or about November 13, 2013, employees were working underneath another employee without the use of hard hats.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1360
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Nov 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a. On or about November 13, 2013, on the roof deck, an employee was working near an unportected edge without the use of guardrail systems, safety nets, or personal fall arrest, exposing himself to a 15 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.1051 A
- Issued
- Nov 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,020 · Current $1,020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided: a. On or about November 13, 2013, on west side of the roof, an employee was having to climb up and over a parapet wall greater than 19 inches high.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1020
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 713990)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339488777.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.