BIDDEFORD, ME ·
OSHA Inspection: SOLERAS ADVANCED COATINGS, LIMITED
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SOLERAS ADVANCED COATINGS, LIMITED in 589 ELM STREET, BIDDEFORD, ME 04005 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 339489882.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SOLERAS ADVANCED COATINGS, LIMITED
- Site address
- 589 ELM STREET
- City
- BIDDEFORD
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04005
- Mailing
- 589 ELM STREET, BIDDEFORD, ME 04005
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332710
- Employees
- 62
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 A04
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications or additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval and capacity plates were not changed accordingly: Establishment - The Toyota fork truck was used with boom attachments without the manufacturer's approval, and a capacity plate was not secured to the lift truck to indicate its lifting capacity utilizing the boom attachments.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1750
- · Z (S) $3500
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years: Establishment - An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not conducted at least once every three years.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.335 A01
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1): Employees working in areas where there are potential electrical hazards were not provided with, and did not use, electrical protective equipment that is appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed: Establishment - Employees conducting voltage testing on energized equipment and testing for the absence of voltage on electrical systems greater than 50 volts were not provided with, and did not use, electrical protective equipment to protect against the hazards of arc flash and electrical shock.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2450
- · Z (S) $4900
1904.33 A
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.33(a): The employer did not save the OSHA 300 Log, the privacy case list (if one existed), the annual summary, and the OSHA 301 Incident Report Forms for five (5) years following the end of the calendar year that these records covered: Establishment - The employer did not have a record of the 2012 annual summary (OSHA 300A).
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $350
- · Z (O) $700
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332710)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339489882.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.