NEW BRAUNFELS, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: ANIOL III LTD
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of ANIOL III LTD in 750 RUSK AVE., NEW BRAUNFELS, TX 78130 (NAICS 623210). OSHA activity number 339489916.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ANIOL III LTD
- Site address
- 750 RUSK AVE.
- City
- NEW BRAUNFELS
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78130
- Mailing
- 750 RUSK AVE., NEW BRAUNFELS, TX 78130
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 623210
- Employees
- 250
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.36 G02
- Issued
- Apr 8, 2014
- Abate by
- May 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,620 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.36(g)(2): An exit access was not at least 28 inches (71.1 cm) wide at all points and the width of the exit and exit discharge was not at least equal to the width of the exit access. On or about November 15, 2013, the employer did not ensure the aisle way in the dietary area, which designated as an exit, was kept at least 28 inches in width, exposing the employees to hazards of fire and/or absorption from the corrosive materials used in the area.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1620
- · Z (S) $2700
1910.37 B06
- Issued
- Apr 8, 2014
- Abate by
- May 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(6): Each exit sign was not illuminated to a surface value of at least five foot-candles (54 lux) by a reliable light source and be distinctive in color. On or about November 15, 2013 the employer did not ensure the exit from the dietary area was illuminated with enough light to be seen during loss of power, exposing employees to trip hazards in the event of an emergency.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Apr 8, 2014
- Abate by
- May 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $2,160 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition. On or about November 15, 2013 the goggles, located in the laundry room of the dietary are, were not kept in a sanitary condition where particles of corrosive laundry detergent are accumulating, exposing the employees to absorption hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2160
- · Z (S) $3600
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Apr 8, 2014
- Abate by
- May 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use. On or about November 15, 2013, the employer did not provide the employees using a corrosive material with an eye flushing system within a quick and safe distance, exposing the employees to absorption hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.303 F02
- Issued
- Apr 8, 2014
- Abate by
- May 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,620 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident. On or about November 18, 2013 the electrical panel behind the dorms was not labeled to identify each circuit powered by the panel, exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1620
- · Z (S) $2700
1910.305 G01 IV A
- Issued
- Apr 8, 2014
- Abate by
- May 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure. On or about November 15, 2013 the employer used a flexible cord to power the exhaust fan in the laundry/storage room of the dietary area, exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.305 B01
- Issued
- Apr 8, 2014
- Abate by
- May 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $2,160 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1): Conductors entering boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not protected from abrasions. a) On or about November 15, 2013 the conduit was pulled away from the electrical panel in the dietary area, which exposed the insulated wires, exposing the employees to electrical hazards. b) On or about November 15, 2013 the conduit containing wires for the cooling system located between the dorms was pulled away from the unit, exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2160
- · Z (S) $3600
1910.305 G02 II
- Issued
- Apr 8, 2014
- Abate by
- May 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(ii): Flexible cords were not used in continuous lengths without splice or tap. On or about November 15, 2013 the cord for the hot water heater in the laundry room, located in the dietary area, was spliced during installation, exposing the employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Apr 8, 2014
- Abate by
- May 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws. On or about November 15, 2013 the cord to the electrical mixer, used in the dietary area, was not equipped with strain relief, which exposed the wires at the point of contact with the outlet, exposing the employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.305 J02 IV
- Issued
- Apr 8, 2014
- Abate by
- May 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $2,160 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(j)(2)(iv): A receptacle installed in a wet or damp location was not suitable for the location. a) On or about November 15, 2013 the outlet for the metal electric mixer was located within twenty-three inches of the sink and was not equipped with GFCI, exposing employees to an electrical shock hazard. b) On or about November 15, 2013 the fan used to dry kitchen utensils was not powered by an outlet containing a Ground Fault Circuit Interruptor (GFCI), when used in a wet area, exposing the employees to an electrical shock hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2160
- · Z (S) $3600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 623210)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339489916.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.