Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: DJ'S ROOFING, LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of DJ'S ROOFING, LLC in 1674 BOSTON AVE., BRIDGEPORT, CT 06610 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339493629.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch DJ'S Roofing, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for DJ'S Roofing, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DJ'S ROOFING, LLC
Site address
1674 BOSTON AVE.
City
BRIDGEPORT
State
CT
ZIP
06610
Mailing
1414 HUNTINGTON RD., STRATFORD, CT 06614
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 11, 2013
Abate by
Dec 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets.    Worksite: The employees who were working on the ground below the roofing work being performed were not protected from head injuries by the use of protective helmets.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 11, 2013
Abate by
Dec 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    Worksite: The employee who was installing asphalt roofing shingles with a pneumatic nail gun was not wearing eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.451 E08

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 11, 2013
Abate by
Dec 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(8): Direct access to or from another surface was used when the scaffold was more than 14 inches (36 cm) horizontally and/or 24 inches (61 cm) vertically from the other surface.    Worksite: The employee who was accessing a ladder jack scaffold platform from the roof was not provided with a safe means of access.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1800
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 11, 2013
Abate by
Jan 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.    Worksite: The ladder jack scaffold from that the employee was working at approximately 20 feet above the ground was not erected under the supervision of a person competent in scaffold erection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1800
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.454 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 11, 2013
Abate by
Jan 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer failed to have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area.  Worksite: The employee who was working from the ladder jack scaffold without fall protection at a height above 10 feet was not trained to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 11, 2013
Abate by
Jan 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  Worksite: The employees who were exposed to fall hazards of above six feet while working on the on 10 in 12 pitch roof were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 11, 2013
Abate by
Dec 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.    Worksite: The employee who was working from the ladder jack scaffold platform at a height above 10 feet was not protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails or a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1800
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.452 K02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 11, 2013
Abate by
Dec 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(2): Ladders used to support the ladderjack scaffolding did not meet the requirements of Sub-part X.    Worksite: The extension ladders used to support the ladder jack scaffold platform were damaged and did not meet the requirements of subpart X.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.452 K04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 11, 2013
Abate by
Dec 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(4): Ladders used to support ladder jacks were not placed, fastened, or equipped with devices to prevent slipping.  Worksite: The extension ladder that was used to support the ladder jack scaffold platform was not placed on a stable surface or equipped with devices to prevent slipping or displacement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 11, 2013
Abate by
Dec 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b).    Worksite: The employees who were working on the 10 in 12 pitch roof more than 6 feet above the ground were not protected from fall hazards by the use guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1800
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.552 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 11, 2013
Abate by
Dec 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.552(a)(1): The employer shall comply with the manufacturer's specifications and limitations applicable to the operation of all hoists and elevators. Where manufacturer's specifications are not available, the limitations assigned to the equipment shall be based on the determinations of a professional engineer competent in the field.    Worksite: The material hoist that was used by employees to gain access to the roof at a height of approximately 22 feet 6 inches above the ground was not designed to be used in such a manner.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1800
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 11, 2013
Abate by
Dec 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladders length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigied support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist emmployees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.    Worksite: The extension ladder that was used by the employee to gain access to the scaffold platform did not have its side rails extended at least 3 feet above the landing surface and a grab rail was not provided.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $2000

View DJ'S Roofing, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339493629.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.