JACKSONVILLE, FL —
OSHA Inspection: LION CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LION CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS, INC. in 4273 SUMMERTON OAKS CIR., JACKSONVILLE, FL 32223 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339493686.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LION CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS, INC.
- Site address
- 4273 SUMMERTON OAKS CIR.
- City
- JACKSONVILLE
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32223
- Mailing
- 2212 S CHICKASAW TRAIL #145, ORLANDO, FL 32825
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Dec 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a. On or about November 19, 2013, inside the house an employee was exposed to the hazard of being struck in the head by falling nail guns or stacks of cut lumber in that he was not wearing a hard hat.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Dec 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury: a. On or about November 19, 2013, on the roof, an employee using a pneumatic nailer was exposed to an eye injury hazard from flying debris in that he was not wearing safety glasses. b. On or about November 19, 2013, on the ground, an employee cutting OSB boards with the Dewalt circular saw was exposed to an eye injury hazard from sawdust and flying debris in that he was not wearing safety glasses.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system: a. On or about November 19, 2013, on the roof trusses, employees installing framing and roof sheathing were exposed to 11 and 21 feet fall hazards in that they were not protected by a fall protection system. b. On or about November 19, 2013, on the second floor employees working near the stair opening were exposed to a 9 feet fall hazard in that they were not protected by a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Dec 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who was exposed to fall hazards that enabled each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a. On or about November 19, 2013, employees who worked at elevations had not been trained in the procedures to minimize fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1051 A
- Issued
- Dec 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairways or ladders were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, and no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided: a. On or about November 19, 2013, the staircase used to access the second floor did not have stair treads, exposing employees to a 9 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Dec 16, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to upper landing surfaces, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladders were used to gain access: a. On or about November 19, 2013, at the front of the garage, the roof access ladder did not extend 3 feet above the roof eave, exposing employees to a 10 feet and 8 inches fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2400
More inspections at Lion Construction Contractors, INC.
View Lion Construction Contractors, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339493686.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.