HUDSON, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: BASEMENT 186
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BASEMENT 186 in 186 NORTH MAIN STREET, HUDSON, OH 44236 (NAICS 812112). OSHA activity number 339496275.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BASEMENT 186
- Site address
- 186 NORTH MAIN STREET
- City
- HUDSON
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44236
- Mailing
- 186 NORTH MAIN STREET, HUDSON, OH 44236
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 812112
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1048 D01 I
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(d)(1)(i): Each employer who has a workplace covered by this standard shall monitor employees to determine their exposure to formaldehyde: On or about December 6, 2013, a hair stylist working with General Keratin in the salon was exposed to formaldehyde vapors at 1.19 ppm which is approximately 0.60 times the short term exposure limit of 2.0 ppm; exposure calculations are based off a 15 minute sample. The employer did not monitor employees to determine if formaldehyde was present. On or about February 7, 2014, a hair stylist working with General Keratin in the salon was exposed to formaldehyde vapors at 1.16 ppm which is approximately 0.58 times the short term exposure limit of 2.0 ppm; exposure calculations are based off a 15 minute sample. The employer did not monitor employees to determine if formaldehyde was present.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.1048 M05
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(m)(5): The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at the workplace, a written hazard communication program for formaldehyde exposures in the workplace: On or about November 21, 2013, the hair stylist working with General Keratin in the salon was exposed to formaldehyde vapors and the employer did not have a written hazard communication program for formaldehyde exposure in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1048 N01
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(n)(1): The employer did not ensure that all employees who were assigned to workplaces where there was exposure to formaldehyde participated in a training program: On or about December 6, 2013, the hair stylist working with General Keratin in the salon was exposed to formaldehyde vapors at 1.19 ppm. The employer did not train employees exposed to formaldehyde at or above 0.1 ppm. On or about February 7, 2014, the hair stylist working with General Keratin in the salon was exposed to formaldehyde vapors at 1.16 ppm. The employer did not train employees exposed to formaldehyde at or above 0.1 ppm.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about November 21, 2013, the employer did not develop and implement a hazard communication program for employees who handle chemicals such as hair dye and perming solution.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical which they used: On or about November 21, 2013, the employer did not have a material safety data sheet (MSDS) for hazadous chemicals such as hair dye, perming solution, or General Keratin.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about November 21, 2013, the employer did not provide training and information to employees who handle hazardous chemicals such as hair dye or perming solution.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment. On or about November 21, 2013 the employer did not have a written hazard assessment identifying the hazards throughout the facility.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 812112)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339496275.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.