Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: GIACO CONSTRUCTION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GIACO CONSTRUCTION in RT 35 & EISENHOWER AVE., NORMANDY BEACH, NJ 08739 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 339497281.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Giaco Construction for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Giaco Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GIACO CONSTRUCTION
Site address
RT 35 & EISENHOWER AVE.
City
NORMANDY BEACH
State
NJ
ZIP
08739
Mailing
245 MILLSTONE RD., PERRINEVILLE, NJ 08535
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2013
Abate by
Feb 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not develop an accident prevention program, that provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment, to be made by competent persons designated by the employer.           a) Rt 35 & Eisenhower Ave.:  The employer did not initiate a program for a competent person to conduct frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite, to identify hazards and/or stop the work in the event workers were placed in a hazardous condition. As such, Giaco Construction employees conducting siding activities from a pump jack scaffold were not using fall protection (guardrails, PFAS, etc.) and were thus exposed to a fall hazard of greater than 12 feet.  Observed on or about 11/18/2013.        NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2013
Abate by
Feb 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.    a) Rt 35 & Eisenhower Ave.:  The employer did not provide employees  working on scaffolds appropriate training.  As such, Giaco Construction employees conducting siding activities from a pump jack scaffold were not using fall protection (guardrails, PFAS, etc.) and were thus exposed to a fall hazard of greater than 12 feet.  Observed on or about 11/18/2013.        NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,020 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1):  Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level:     a) Rt 35 & Eisenhower Ave.:  Giaco Construction employees conducting siding activities from a pump jack scaffold were not using fall protection (guardrails, PFAS, etc.) and were thus exposed to a fall hazard of greater than 12 feet.  Observed on or about 11/18/2013.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1020
  • · Z (S) $1700

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339497281.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.