Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: OUTRIGGER CONDOMINIUM COLLECTION

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of OUTRIGGER CONDOMINIUM COLLECTION in 250 WAIKOLOA BEACH DRIVE, SUITE B13, WAIKOLOA, HI 96738 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 339497760.

Watch Outrigger Condominium Collection — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Outrigger Condominium Collection is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
250 WAIKOLOA BEACH DRIVE, SUITE B13
City
WAIKOLOA
State
HI
ZIP
96738
Mailing
250 WAIKOLOA BEACH DRIVE, SUITE B13, WAIKOLOA, HI 96738
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
721110
Employees
17
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1030 F02 I

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4000.00 · Current $3000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(i):  Hepatitis B vaccination was not made available after the employee had received the training required in 29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii)(I) or within 10 working days of initial assignment to employees who had occupational exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials:      a) Between approximately June 13, 2013 and November 13, 2013, at the above located workplace, all new employees having occupational exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials were not offered the Hepatitis B vaccination series within the first ten working days of initial assignment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.1030 G02 II A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(ii)(A):  The employer did not ensure that training was provided to employees with occupational exposure at the time of initial assignment to tasks where occupational exposure might take place:          a) During the period of approximately June 13, 2013 and November 13, 2013, at the above located workplace, new employees were required to perform duties that involved occupational exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials. The employer had not provided training (as required by 1910.1030(g)(2)) at the time initial assignment to tasks where occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens may occur.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 C01 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv):   The Exposure Control Plan was not reviewed and updated at least annually and whenever necessary to reflect new or modified task and procedures which affect occupational exposure and reflect new or revised employee positions with occupational exposure.      a) On or about November 13, 2013, at the above located workplace, the employer's Bloodborne Pathogen Exposure Control Plan was not been updated to reflect employee job classifications and the workplace procedures used at the time of the inspection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:     a) On or about November 13, 2013, at the above located workplace, employees were required to work with hazardous chemicals such as Quik Heavy Duty Cleaner - Degreaser and Spartan RJ8 Cleaning compound. The employee's skin and eye were exposed to the hazards and necessitated the uses of personal protective equipment.  The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(ii): Employers did not develop, implement, and maintain a written hazard communication program which at least describes the methods the employer used to inform employees of the hazards of non-routine tasks:      a) On or about November 13, 2013, at the above located workplace, employees worked with hazardous chemicals. The employer's written hazard communication program did not describe the methods the employer used to inform employees of the hazards associated with non-routine tasks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(2)(i):  The employers did not develop, implement, and maintain a written hazard communication program which at least describes the methods the employer used to provide other employer(s) on-site access to material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical the other employer(s)' employees may be exposed to while working:   a) On or about November 13, 2013, at the above located workplace, employees used hazardous chemicals. The employer's written hazard communication program did not describe the methods used by the employer to provide other employers on-site access to material safety data sheets.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339497760.