PAGO PAGO, AS ·
OSHA Inspection: MARCIAL PARUNGO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARCIAL PARUNGO in PO BOX 7085, PAGO PAGO, AS 96799 (NAICS 238190). OSHA activity number 339502866.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MARCIAL PARUNGO
- Site address
- PO BOX 7085
- City
- PAGO PAGO
- State
- AS
- ZIP
- 96799
- Mailing
- PO BOX 7085, PAGO PAGO, AS 96799
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238190
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.96
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.96: The employer did not ensure employees wear proper footwear which meets the requirements and specifications in American National Standard for Men's Safety-Toe Footwear, Z41.1-1967. Petesa Residential Project: On November 25, 2013; where employees carrying construction materials up the stairs, using tools on the ground level and second floor were wearing open-toed shoes.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $900
- · Z (S) $1200
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: Petesa Residential Project: On November 25, 2013; where employees were observed on the ground and second floor exposed to head injuries and were not wearing hard hats.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $900
- · Z (S) $1200
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $1,020 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Petesa Residential Project: On November 25, 2013; where employees working on the second floor balcony were not protected by standard guard railings or by using personal fall arrest system were exposed to fall hazards to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1020
- · Z (S) $1360
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238190)
More inspections in AS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339502866.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.