Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AMERICAN METAL COATINGS,INC..

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of AMERICAN METAL COATINGS,INC.. in 1088 IVANHOE AVE., CLEVELAND, OH 44108 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 339503203.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch American Metal Coatings,Inc.. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for American Metal Coatings,Inc.. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1088 IVANHOE AVE.
City
CLEVELAND
State
OH
ZIP
44108
Mailing
1088 IVANHOE AVE., CLEVELAND, OH 44108
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332813
Employees
41
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 A08 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2014
Abate by
Apr 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(8)(ii): Every floor hole into which persons could accidentally walk was not guarded by a floor hole cover of standard strength and construction:           On or about 11/26/2013 a floor hole measuring approximately 10 x 24 inches, located next to line 5, was not effectively guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.67 C02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 41 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2014
Abate by
Jun 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.67(c)(2)(ii): An employee(s) operating an aerial lift(s) was not properly trained:             Training was not provided an operator, prior to the employee operating an aerial lift at the site.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.147 C04 II D

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 41 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2014
Abate by
Apr 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control:    Although the employer developed and implemented an energy control program for use at the facility, it was deficient and did not include, the verification step for testing the machinery to determine or verify the effectiveness of the lockout device(s).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 41 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2014
Abate by
Jun 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):         Training was not provided to each operator prior to the employee operating industrial trucks at the site.  Employees operate equipment such as, the company's Toyota fork truck.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 41 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2014
Abate by
Jun 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined at least daily before being placed in service:       Inspections of the company's powered industrial trucks (forklifts) were not completed by operator(s) prior to the trucks being placed into service.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.219 F01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2014
Abate by
Mar 26, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(1): Gear(s) were not guarded by a complete enclosure or by one of the methods specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(f)(1)(ii) and (f)(1)(iii):     The mesh point of the gear assembly on line #5 (the Zinc/Nickel-Alloy line), located in the production area, was not adequately guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2100

View American Metal Coatings,Inc..'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339503203.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.