OXFORD, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: LITTLE RIVER POWER EQUIPMENT, INC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LITTLE RIVER POWER EQUIPMENT, INC in 117 OXFORD RD, OXFORD, CT 06478 (NAICS 532310). OSHA activity number 339505174.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LITTLE RIVER POWER EQUIPMENT, INC
- Site address
- 117 OXFORD RD
- City
- OXFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06478
- Mailing
- 117 OXFORD RD, OXFORD, CT 06478
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 532310
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
13 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.110 F02 I
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.110(f)(2)(i): Containers in storage were not located in an area that minimized exposure to excessive temperature rise, physical damage, or tampering from unauthorized persons: ESTABLISHMENT: Numerous propane tanks were stored in an unstable and unsecure manner and subjected to physical damage.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered: ESTABLISHMENT: The employees performing the following tasks were not wearing appropriate personal protective equipment. 1. Employees operating a Husqvarna chainsaw to cut wooden pallets or crates, were not wearing cut-resistant leg protection. 2. Employees filling propane tanks were not wearing protective gloves.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment: ESTABLISHMENT: The employees operating Husqvarna 240 chainsaw to cut wooden pallets or crates were not wearing eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): ESTABLISHMENT: The employer had not conducted the Workplace Hazard Assessment to determine the necessity and appropriate types of personal protective equipment (PPE) for the employees.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.132 F01
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment: ESTABLISHMENT: The employees, required to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) were not trained in the Workplace Hazard Assessment pertaining to the use and maintenance of personal protective equipment (PPE).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch: ESTABLISHMENT: The work rest of the Baldor grinder was adjusted more than one eighth of an inch from the grinding wheel.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch: ESTABLISHMENT: The peripheral member at the top of the Baldor grinder was more than one fourth of an inch from the grinding wheel periphery.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.252 A02 VI C
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.252(a)(2)(vi)(C): Cutting or welding was permitted in the presence of explosive atmospheres (mixture of flammable gases, vapors, liquids, or dusts with air), or explosive atmospheres that could develop inside uncleaned or improperly prepared tanks or equipment which had previously contained such materials, or that could develop in areas with an accumulation of combustible dusts: ESTABLISHMENT: Welding processes were performed by employees in an area where a 35 gallon waste fuel metal drum was stored.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.252 C01 III
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.252(c)(1)(iii): Local exhaust or general ventilating systems were not provided and arranged to keep the amount of toxic fumes, gases, or dusts below the maximum allowable concentration as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1000: ESTABLISHMENT: Local exhaust and/or general ventilation systems were not provided and arranged in the area where empoyees were performing Mig and/or oxygen/fuel gas welding and cutting operations.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.253 B02 II
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(2)(ii): Inside of buildings, cylinders were not stored in a well-protected, well-ventilated, dry location, at least 20 feet (6.1 m) from highly combustible materials such as oil or excelsior: ESTABLISHMENT: A compressed oxygen gas cylinder was stored next to oxygen and acetylene cylinders on a cart which had the valves hooked up.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: ESTABLISHMENT: The employer had not developed and implemented a written Hazard Communication program where employees were required to work with and handle chemicals, such as (but not limited to) propane.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $720
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s). (Electronic access and other alternatives to maintaining paper copies of the safety data sheets are permitted as long as no barriers to immediate employee access in each workplace are created by such options.) ESTABLISHMENT: The employer did not maintain Material Safety Data sheets for chemicals, such as (but not limited to) propane.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h): Employees were not provided effective information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and (2) on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into the workplace: ESTABLISHMENT: The employer did not provide training and information on Hazard Communication program to employees were required to work with and handle chemicals, such as (but not limited to) propane.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 532310)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339505174.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.