Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,195,903Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-18 Last loaded 2026-08-21

OSHA Inspection: GINGRICH ENTERPRISES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GINGRICH ENTERPRISES, INC. in 1503 W FRONT ST, ROANOKE, IL 61561 (NAICS 333111). OSHA activity number 339506321.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Gingrich Enterprises, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Gingrich Enterprises, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1503 W FRONT ST
City
ROANOKE
State
IL
ZIP
61561
Mailing
1503 W FRONT ST, ROANOKE, IL 61561
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333111
Employees
24
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2014
Abate by
Mar 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1):      The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:    Employees working in the shop area were exposed to the hazard of being crushed by a load suspended from overhead hoists located above the work stations and the employer failed to establish and follow a program of frequent and periodic inspections of the hoist systems.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1200
  • · C (S) $1600
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.147 C04 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2014
Abate by
Mar 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii):     Energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A), (c)(4)(ii)(B), (c)(4)(ii)(C) and (c)(4)(ii)(D):     Employees operating the 200 ton press were exposed to amputation hazards while changing the dies and the employer did not develop or utilize machine specific procedures.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1500
  • · C (S) $2000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2014
Abate by
Mar 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i):     The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program was understood by employees:29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i):     Employees operating a 200 ton hydraulic press were exposed to amputation hazards when they changed dies and the employer did not conduct training for lockout tagout procedures.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $2000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.147 D03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2014
Abate by
Mar 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(3):     All energy isolating devices that were needed to control the energy to the machine or equipment were not physically located and operated in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source(s):     Employees operating a 200 ton hydraulic press were exposed to amputation hazards when they changed dies and the machine was not locked out.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $2800
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2014
Abate by
Aug 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii):     Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):     Employees operating a 200 ton hydraulic press were exposed to amputation hazards and the machine was not guarded.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1500
  • · C (S) $2000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.332 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2014
Abate by
Mar 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1):     Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments:    Employees were exposed to contact with parts of fixed electric equipment and circuits while performing diagnostic testing on electrical panel boxes and the employees were not trained and familiar with the safety-related work practices.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1800
  • · C (S) $2800
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.333 B02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2014
Abate by
Mar 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2)(i):   The employer did not maintain a written copy of the procedures outlined in paragraph (b)(2) of 29 CFR 1910.333 and did not make it available for inspection by the Assistant Secretary of Labor and his or her authorized representatives:  Employees were exposed to contact with parts of fixed electric equipment and circuits while performing diagnostic testing on electrical panel boxes and the employer did not develop and maintain a copy of written electrical procedures that outlined how these activities would be conducted in order to maintain employee safety.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.333 B02 II A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2014
Abate by
Mar 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2)(ii)(A):   Safe procedures for deenergizing circuits and equipment were not determined before circuits or equipment were deenergized:  Employees were exposed to contact with parts of fixed electric equipment and circuits while performing diagnostic testing on electrical panel boxes and the employer did not determine safe procedures for deenergizing circuits.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

View Gingrich Enterprises, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339506321.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.