ROANOKE, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: GINGRICH ENTERPRISES, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GINGRICH ENTERPRISES, INC. in 1503 W FRONT ST, ROANOKE, IL 61561 (NAICS 333111). OSHA activity number 339506321.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GINGRICH ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Site address
- 1503 W FRONT ST
- City
- ROANOKE
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61561
- Mailing
- 1503 W FRONT ST, ROANOKE, IL 61561
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333111
- Employees
- 24
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: Employees working in the shop area were exposed to the hazard of being crushed by a load suspended from overhead hoists located above the work stations and the employer failed to establish and follow a program of frequent and periodic inspections of the hoist systems.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $1200
- · C (S) $1600
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.147 C04 II
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): Energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A), (c)(4)(ii)(B), (c)(4)(ii)(C) and (c)(4)(ii)(D): Employees operating the 200 ton press were exposed to amputation hazards while changing the dies and the employer did not develop or utilize machine specific procedures.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $1500
- · C (S) $2000
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program was understood by employees:29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Employees operating a 200 ton hydraulic press were exposed to amputation hazards when they changed dies and the employer did not conduct training for lockout tagout procedures.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $2000
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.147 D03
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(3): All energy isolating devices that were needed to control the energy to the machine or equipment were not physically located and operated in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source(s): Employees operating a 200 ton hydraulic press were exposed to amputation hazards when they changed dies and the machine was not locked out.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $2800
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): Employees operating a 200 ton hydraulic press were exposed to amputation hazards and the machine was not guarded.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $1500
- · C (S) $2000
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.332 B01
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments: Employees were exposed to contact with parts of fixed electric equipment and circuits while performing diagnostic testing on electrical panel boxes and the employees were not trained and familiar with the safety-related work practices.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $1800
- · C (S) $2800
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.333 B02 I
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2)(i): The employer did not maintain a written copy of the procedures outlined in paragraph (b)(2) of 29 CFR 1910.333 and did not make it available for inspection by the Assistant Secretary of Labor and his or her authorized representatives: Employees were exposed to contact with parts of fixed electric equipment and circuits while performing diagnostic testing on electrical panel boxes and the employer did not develop and maintain a copy of written electrical procedures that outlined how these activities would be conducted in order to maintain employee safety.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.333 B02 II A
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2)(ii)(A): Safe procedures for deenergizing circuits and equipment were not determined before circuits or equipment were deenergized: Employees were exposed to contact with parts of fixed electric equipment and circuits while performing diagnostic testing on electrical panel boxes and the employer did not determine safe procedures for deenergizing circuits.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections at Gingrich Enterprises, INC.
View Gingrich Enterprises, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333111)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339506321.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.