Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: AZTEC TUBULAR PRODUCTS

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of AZTEC TUBULAR PRODUCTS in 400 N. TARRANT ST., CROWLEY, TX 76036 (NAICS 333992). OSHA activity number 339507949.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Aztec Tubular Products for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Aztec Tubular Products is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
400 N. TARRANT ST.
City
CROWLEY
State
TX
ZIP
76036
Mailing
400 N. TARRANT ST., CROWLEY, TX 76036
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333992
Employees
70
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 9, 2014
Abate by
May 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,310 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i): Visible gages or audible alarms or pressure activated devices were not installed to indicate or insure that the required air velocity is maintained:     (a)  On or about 12/4/2014, the paint spray booth located in the Shipping/Receiving Building (Building 7), did not have a manometer installed to indicate that proper air velocity was maintained, exposing employees to respiratory inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2310
  • · Z (S) $4200

1910.107 C06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 9, 2014
Abate by
May 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,540 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(6): Electrical wiring and equipment not subject to deposits of combustible residues but located in a spraying area as herein defined were not explosion-proof type approved for Class I, group D locations and did not otherwise conform to the provisions of subpart S of this part, for Class I, Division 1, Hazardous Locations:     On or about 12/4/2013, in the Shipping and Receiving Department, the Airmaster floor fan with standard wall plug located within 20 feet of the spray area was not explosion proof, exposing employees to burn hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1540
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.134 C01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 9, 2014
Abate by
May 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:   (a) On or about 12/4/2013, the employer had not established a written respiratory protection program for employees required to use filtering facepieces, exposing employees to respiratory illness.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.134 K01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 9, 2014
Abate by
May 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide respirator training that would ensure each employee could demonstrate knowledge of items in section (i)-(vii):  (a)  On or about 12/04/2013, employer had not provided respirator training to employees required to use a dust mask, exposing employees to respiratory illnesses.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 9, 2014
Abate by
May 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,695 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    On or about 12/4/2013, in the PMC Building, the NATCO drill press, model F2F, Serial Number F1B-220, had no guard covering the front of the machine, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by flying parts.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2695
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.219 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 9, 2014
Abate by
May 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,310 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3): Sprocket wheels and chains which were seven -7 feet or less above floors or platforms were not enclosed:    On or about 12/4/2014, near Forge 4 in Building 11, chain and sprocket which is located at floor level was not enclosed, exposing employees to the hazard of being caught in the chain.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2310
  • · Z (S) $4200

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339507949.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.