Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: OUTDOOR ALUMINUM, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of OUTDOOR ALUMINUM, INC. in 1989 E STATE HWY 52, GENEVA, AL 36340 (NAICS 337127). OSHA activity number 339510869.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Outdoor Aluminum, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Outdoor Aluminum, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1989 E STATE HWY 52
City
GENEVA
State
AL
ZIP
36340
Mailing
1989 E STATE HWY 52, GENEVA, AL 36340
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337127
Employees
74
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:  a) On or about December 10, 2013 at the shipping area:  The employer exposed employees to fall hazards in that fall protection was not provided while operating from manbasket with an incomplete guard rail.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.178 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval.  a) On or about 10 December, 2013 and times prior to at the shipping area:  the employer exposed employees to a fall hazard, in that the manbasket was not approved for forklift use with employees elevated while performing routine maintenance.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.184 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2014
Abate by
Feb 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(d): Each day before being used, the sling and all fastenings and attachments were not being inspected for damage or defects by a competent person designated by the employer:  a)  On or about 10 December 2013 and times prior at the shipping area:  The employer exposed employees to struckby hazards, in that cut, torn and frayed slings were allowed to be used by employees while lifting loads.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 74 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2014
Abate by
Feb 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  a)  On or about 10 December, 2013 and times prior to at the shipping department:  The employer exposed employees to struck by hazards, in that forklift operators performance was not evaluated at least once every three years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 74 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2014
Abate by
Apr 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  a)  On or about 10 December, 2013 and times prior to at the facility:  The employer exposed employees to chemical hazards from oils and grease used during maintenance.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Outdoor Aluminum, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339510869.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.