Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: TURNKEY-CORRECTIONS

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TURNKEY-CORRECTIONS in W12452 655TH AVENUE, PRESCOTT, WI 54021 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 339510976.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Turnkey-Corrections for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Turnkey-Corrections is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TURNKEY-CORRECTIONS
Site address
W12452 655TH AVENUE
City
PRESCOTT
State
WI
ZIP
54021
Mailing
2801 HARVEY STREET, HUDSON, WI 54016
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332999
Employees
97
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 L02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2014
Abate by
Mar 31, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $1,620 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(l)(2)(i): All non-deposited air-suspended powder was not safely removed via exhaust ducts to the powder recovery cyclone or receptacle:    (a) Throughout the spray area; the employer failed to supply any exhaust ventilation to safely remove all non-deposited air-suspended powders into recovery cyclone or receptacle.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1620
  • · Z (S) $2700

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2014
Abate by
Apr 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $1,620 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    (a) Powder coating spray operation;  The employer requires the use of respiratory protection for the employees who perform the powder coating spray operation, but the employer has not established or implemented a written program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1620
  • · Z (S) $2700

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2014
Abate by
Apr 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    (a) Powder coating spray operation; the employer requires the employees to wear a 1/2 face elastomeric tight fitting face piece with NIOSH approved 7500-1 cartridges prior to determining the employees ability to use a respirator through medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2014
Abate by
Apr 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  (a) Powder coating spray operation; the employer requires the employees to wear a 1/2 face elastomeric tight fitting face piece with NIOSH approved 7500-1 cartridges without providing fit testing prior to their initial use.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2014
Abate by
Jun 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminants chemical state and physical form:  (a) Throughout the facility; The employer failed to identify and evaluate any workplace respiratory hazards or the contaminants state and physical form resulting from work process such as, but not limited to powder coating spray operations, welding, and plasma cutting operations.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2014
Abate by
Apr 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $1,620 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200 (e), (g), and (h) will be met:    (a) Throughout the facility;  the employer failed to develop, implement or maintain a written hazard communication program at the workplace for chemical exposures, such as, but not limited to solvents, corrosives and welding fumes and products.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1620
  • · Z (S) $2700

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2014
Abate by
Apr 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use:  (a) Throughout the facility;  the employer did not have Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for any hazardous chemicals in use for chemical exposures, such as, but not limited to solvents, corrosives and welding fumes and products.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2014
Abate by
Apr 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  (a) Throughout the facility;  The employer does not provide effective information or training on hazardous chemicals in the workplace for chemical exposures, such as, but not limited to solvents, corrosives and welding fumes and products.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.141 D02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2014
Abate by
Apr 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.141(d)(2)(ii): Lavatories were not provided with hot and cold, or tepid running water:  (a) Throughout the facility; the employer failed to provide hot, cold, or tepid running water for a normally attended work location in operations for approximately 2-3 weeks.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.151 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2014
Abate by
Apr 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:      (a) Throughout the facility; the employer failed to provide adequate facilities for flushing eyes or quick drenching the body.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339510976.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.