OSHA Inspection: RED'S INDOOR GUN RANGE NORTH

Issued

May 28, 2014

Abate by

Jun 18, 2014

Penalty

Initial $3,080 · Current $3,080

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:   On or about December 5, 2013, the employer did not develop or implement a monitoring program for employees over exposed to noise while working in the range.

Issued

May 28, 2014

Abate by

Jun 18, 2014

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equaled or exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels.   On or about December 5, 2013 the employer did not provide audiometric testing for the employees that are exposed to excessive noise while working in the range area.

Issued

May 28, 2014

Abate by

Jun 18, 2014

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.95(g)(5)(i): The employer did not establish, within 6 months of an employee's first exposure at or above the action level, a valid baseline audiogram against which subsequent audiograms can be compared:   On or about December 5, 2013 the employer did not establish a baseline for the employees exposed to excessive noise while working on the gun range.  The employees are exposed to levels ranging from 93.61 to 99.63 dBa TWA.

Issued

May 28, 2014

Abate by

Jun 18, 2014

Penalty

Initial $3,850 · Current $3,850

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers approved for the purpose:   On or about January 23, 2014 the employer did not ensure the faceplate was attached to cover the exposure wires to the electrical box on the range, exposing employees to electrical hazards.

Issued

May 28, 2014

Abate by

Jun 18, 2014

Penalty

Initial $3,850 · Current $3,850

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(3)(i): The employer did not establish and implement a written compliance program to reduce exposures to or below the permissible exposure limit, solely by means of engineering and work practice controls.   On or about December 5, 2013 the employer did not establish and implement a written compliance program for the employees with exposure to lead.

Issued

May 28, 2014

Abate by

Jun 18, 2014

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(7): Additional exposure monitoring was not conducted when there was a change in production, process, control or personnel, or any other reason to suspect a change that may have resulted in new or additional exposure to lead.   On or about December 5, 2013 the employer did not perform additional exposure monitoring when additional employees were added to the firing range cleaning process, exposing employees to inhalation hazards.

Issued

May 28, 2014

Abate by

Jun 18, 2014

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1025(j)(2)(i)(B): The employer did not make available biological monitoring in the form of blood sampling and analysis for lead and zinc protoprohyrin levels available at least every 2 months to employees whose last blood sample indicated a blood lead level at or above 40 micrograms per 100 grams of whole blood:   The employer did not ensure that the employees, at or above forty micrograms per one hundred grams whole blood (40ug/100g), were retested every two months for blood lead levels.

Issued

May 28, 2014

Abate by

Jun 18, 2014

Penalty

Initial $500 · Current $500

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): The employer did not prohibit a tight-fitting facepiece to be worn by employees who had facial hair that comes between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face:   On or about December 5 2013, the employer did not ensure that employees using respirators were properly shaved to form a seal between the facepiece and facial surface of the employees' nose and mouth area, exposing the employees to inhalation hazards.

Issued

May 28, 2014

Abate by

Jun 18, 2014

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $500

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1025(m)(1)(iii): The employer did not include lead in the hazard communication program established to comply with the HCS (� 1910.1200), and the employer did not ensure that each employee had access to labels on containers of lead and to safety data sheets, and that employees were trained on lead in accordance with the requirements of HCS and paragraph (l) of this section.     On or about December 5, 2013 the employer did not ensure that the hazard communication program contained information about lead and the health effects it can have on the employees from inhalation, ingestion, and absorption.