Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ATLANTIC MEECO

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ATLANTIC MEECO in 1501 EAST ELECTRIC AVE., MCALESTER, OK 74501 (NAICS 332311). OSHA activity number 339515272.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Atlantic Meeco — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Atlantic Meeco is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ATLANTIC MEECO
Site address
1501 EAST ELECTRIC AVE.
City
MCALESTER
State
OK
ZIP
74501
Mailing
1501 EAST ELECTRIC AVE., MCALESTER, OK 74501
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332311
Employees
29
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2014
Abate by
Jun 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): A continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (n) was not instituted when employee noise exposures equaled or exceeded an 8 hour time weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 dBA:    On or about April 2, 2014, the employer did not administer a continuing and effective hearing conservation program for employees with an 8-hour time-weighted average exposure greater than 85 dBA exposing employees to the hazard of hearing loss.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2400
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.95 D01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2014
Abate by
Jun 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:     On or about April 2, 2014, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program for employees with an 8-hour time-weighted average exposure greater than 85 dBA exposing employees to the hazard of hearing loss.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 G05 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2014
Abate by
Jun 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(5)(i): The employer did not establish, within 6 months of an employee's first exposure at or above the action level, a valid baseline audiogram against which subsequent audiograms can be compared:    On or about April 2, 2014, the employer did not establish a baseline audiogram for all employees exposed to noise above an 8-hour time-weighted average exposure greater than 85 dBA exposing employees to the hazard of hearing loss.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2014
Abate by
Jun 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment:    On or about December 10, 2013, the employer did not maintain sufficient access and working space around all electric equipment exposing employees to the hazard of contact-with electricity resulting in electrical shock.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1700
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.334 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2014
Abate by
Jun 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(4): Portable electric equipment and flexible cords used in highly conductive work locations (such as those inundated with water or other conductive locations) or in job locations where employees were likely to contact water or conductive liquids were not approved for those locations:    On or about December 10, 2013, the employer did not ensure all electric equipment and flexible cords used in the shop in areas where water accumulates on the floor from leaks in the roof are approved for use in a wet location exposing employees to the hazard of contact-with electricity resulting in electrical shock.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2014
Abate by
Apr 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:   On or about December 10, 2013, the employer did not provide employees voluntarily wearing N95 filtering face-piece respirators with Appendix D to the Respiratory Protection standard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable Fire Extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:  On or about December 10, 2013, the employer did not maintain clear access to all fire extinguishers provided for employee use exposing employees to the hazard of fire and smoke inhalation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 E03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2014
Abate by
Apr 23, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check:   On or about December 10, 2013, the employer did not ensure all fire extinguishers provided for employee use had received an annual maintenance check exposing employees to the hazard of fire and smoke inhalation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2014
Abate by
Jun 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    On or about December 10, 2013, the employer did not provide Hazard Communication training to employees using chemicals such as, but not limited to, isopropyl alcohol, Lube Matic Wire Kleener and Lubricant, Radnor Nozzle Gel, Fabulous Blaster and WD-40 exposing employees to the hazard of contact with hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Atlantic Meeco's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339515272.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.