SAN ANTONIO, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: SERGIO HERNANDEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SERGIO HERNANDEZ in 3111 THOUSAND OAKS DR, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78247 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 339516502.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SERGIO HERNANDEZ
- Site address
- 3111 THOUSAND OAKS DR
- City
- SAN ANTONIO
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78247
- Mailing
- 2217 AVE A, GRAND PRAIRIE, TX 75051
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238310
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Dec 23, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 28, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: Canopy, South side: On or about December 11, 2013, employee(s) who were not equipped with fall protection while working on a sloped canopy, installing Prolinx Building Wrap to the exterior of the building, were exposed to a fall of approximately 9 feet and up to 13 feet from the ground below.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $960
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Dec 23, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 28, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: (a) Canopy, South side: On or about December 11, 2013, employee(s) were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 9 feet to the ground below when a 20-foot Werner Extension Ladder was utilized to access and exit a canopy from the ground level and the extension ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing of the canopy surface to which the employees were gaining access. (b) Canopy, East side: On or about December 11, 2013, employee(s) were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 9 feet to the ground below when a 20-foot Werner Extension Ladder was utilized to access and exit a canopy from the ground level and the extension ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing of the canopy surface to which the employees were gaining access.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $960
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Dec 23, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 28, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: (a) Canopy, South side: On or about December 11, 2013, employee(s) were exposed to a fall hazard from the use of a Husky 8-foot step ladder (Model 01-48001-00) which was utilized in a leaning position and was not used in the manner that it was designed for. (b) Canopy, South side: On or about December 11, 2013, employee(s) were exposed to a fall hazard when a 20-foot Werner Extension Ladder with improperly positioned foot pads was used to access and exit the canopy of a building which was a height of 9 feet at the access point to the ground below .
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $960
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.1060 B
- Issued
- Dec 23, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 28, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(b): The employer did not provide retraining as necessary so that each employee exposed to fall hazards maintained the understanding and knowledge acquired through initial training: (a) Canopy, South side: On or about December 11, 2013, employee(s) who were exposed to a fall hazard from the use of a 20-foot Werner Extension Ladder with improperly positioned foot pads and whose side rails did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing of the canopy being accessed were not provided with retraining on hazards associated with falls or on fall prevention procedures. (b) Canopy, South side: On or about December 11, 2013, employee(s) who were exposed to a fall hazard from the use of a Husky 8-foot step ladder (Model 01-48001-00), which was utilized in a leaning position, were not provided with retraining on hazards associated with falls or on fall prevention procedures.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $960
- · Z (S) $1600
More inspections at Sergio Hernandez
View Sergio Hernandez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238310)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339516502.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.