Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: EDJ CONSTRUCTION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EDJ CONSTRUCTION in 64/66, 65/67 CUBETA ROAD, MIDDLETOWN, CT 06457 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339516668.

Watch EDJ Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for EDJ Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
EDJ CONSTRUCTION
Site address
64/66, 65/67 CUBETA ROAD
City
MIDDLETOWN
State
CT
ZIP
06457
Mailing
1095 CAPITAL AVE, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06606
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   Location:  64/66 Cubeta Road, Middletown, CT     The employer did not ensure that all employees who were performing roofing work were protected from falling more than six feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person.   Location:  65/67 Cubeta Road, Middletown, CT     Five employees were all tied off to the same fall protection anchor point which was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 lbs per employee.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 10 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   Location:  Cubeta Road, Middletown, CT     The employer did not ensure that all employees were trained in the hazards associated with falls and the proper ways and procedures in order to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.   Location:  Cubeta Road, Middletown, CT     The employer did not ensure that all employees had been trained in the safe set-up and use of extension ladders.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:   Location:  65/67 Cubeta Road, Middletown, CT     Employees were using an aluminum extension ladder in order to access the roof, and the ladder did not extend at least three feet above the upper landing surface of the roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339516668.