Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: VICTOR HERRERA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of VICTOR HERRERA in 2518 RALPH ELLISON WAY, WASHINGTON, DC 20016 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339518698.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Victor Herrera for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Victor Herrera is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
VICTOR HERRERA
Site address
2518 RALPH ELLISON WAY
City
WASHINGTON
State
DC
ZIP
20016
Mailing
245 KENT DR., MANASSAS PARK, VA 20111
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
8
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards:  a) Training on fall hazards and fall protection was not provided to employees engaged in roofing activities, exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 25 feet, on or about 12/11/13.  Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe condition(s) and the regulation(s) applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazard(s) or other exposure to illness or injury:  a)   Training was not provided to employees on the use of personal protective equipment, such as but not limited to, the using of eye protection when exposed to struck-by hazards when operating pneumatic nail guns, on or about 12/11/13.  Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.95 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.95(a): Personal protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, was not provided, used, or maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it was necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation, or physical contact:  a) Employees were using pneumatic nail guns without eye protection exposing them to struck-by hazards, on or about 12/11/13.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.502 D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.502(d): The employer used body belts as part of a personal fall arrest system:   a) Employees on the roof of the structure engaged in roofing activities used body belts for fall protection, exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 25 feet, on or about 12/11/13.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339518698.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.