EDISON, NJ ·
OSHA Inspection: GENTLE FAMILY DENTISTRY, LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of GENTLE FAMILY DENTISTRY, LLC in 34-36 PROGRESS STREET, B-6, EDISON, NJ 08820 (NAICS 621210). OSHA activity number 339520611.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GENTLE FAMILY DENTISTRY, LLC
- Site address
- 34-36 PROGRESS STREET, B-6
- City
- EDISON
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 08820
- Mailing
- 34-36 PROGRESS STREET, B-6, EDISON, NJ 08820
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 621210
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1030 C01 II
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2014
- Abate by
- May 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii): The employer's Exposure Control Plan did not contain at least the elements in 29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii)(A) through (c)(1)(ii)(C): a) Assisting in dental procedures and/or handling contaminated instruments from those procedures present a likelihood of skin, eye, mucous membrane or parenteral contact with blood. The generic exposure control plan for bloodborne pathogens within a compliance seminar manual kept in the dentist's office had not been adapted to the practice through the inclusion of site-specific details including a list of jobs / tasks with occupational exposure, as well as the schedule & method of implementation of program elements such as Hepatitis B vaccination, employee training, and recordkeeping. Condition(s) were noted on or about 12/13/2013.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1500
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.1030 F01 I
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2014
- Abate by
- May 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(1)(i): The employer did not make available the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series to all employees who have occupational exposure: a) Employee(s) who assist in dental procedures and/or handle contaminated instruments from those procedures have reasonably anticipated skin, eye mucous membrane or parenteral contact with blood. Each employee with such occupational exposure was not offered the Hepatitis B vaccination series. Condition(s) were noted on or about 12/13/2013.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1030 G02 I
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2014
- Abate by
- May 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee with occupational exposure participated in a training program: a) Employee(s) who assist in dental procedures and/or handle contaminated instruments from those procedures have reasonably anticipated skin, eye, mucous membrane or parenteral contact with blood. Upon initial hire, and at least annually thereafter, each employee with such occupational exposure was not provided training including, but not limited to; access to a copy of the OSHA standard on bloodborne Pathogens and explanation of the workplace exposure control plan, modes of transmission of bloodborne pathogens, methods established for preventing or reducing exposure, and procedures for reporting an exposure incident. Condition(s) were noted on or about 12/13/2013.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1030 D04 III A 2 I
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2014
- Abate by
- May 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(iii)(A)(2)(i): During use, containers for contaminated sharps were not easily accessible to personnel or located as close as was feasible to the immediate area where sharps were used or could be reasonably anticipated to be found: a) Waste containers for disposal of contaminated sharps were not furnished in each of the patient exam rooms where the sharps were used; but instead were kept in the lab / sterilization room in the central floor area of the practice. Condition(s) were noted on or about 12/13/2013.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1500
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2014
- Abate by
- May 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) A chemical hazard communication plan had not been developed and implemented for the dental office, where employee(s) use antimicrobial cleaning products with irritant properties. (LOCATION)(IDENTIFY SPECIFIC CHEMICAL/PRODUCT(S) EXPOSURE INCLUDING SPECIFIC TARGET ORGAN EFFECTS, CARCINOGEN WARNING AND/OR PHYSICAL HAZARDS AS APPLICABLE WHICH ARE NOT LISTED ON THE LABEL)
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 621210)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339520611.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.