Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: FLEXBRITE, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of FLEXBRITE, INC. in 305 MCFARLAND ST., HOUSTON, TX 77011 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 339521452.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Flexbrite, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Flexbrite, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FLEXBRITE, INC.
Site address
305 MCFARLAND ST.
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77011
Mailing
305 MCFARLAND ST., HOUSTON, TX 77011
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332812
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 1, 2014
Abate by
May 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:  (a)  At the facility, employees are required to use a North 7700, half-face respirator with organic vapor cartridges when applyihg tetrachloride to parts to be vacuum coated.  (b) At the facility, employees are required to use a 3M half-face respirator with HEPA filters when bead blasting with the enclosure door open.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 1, 2014
Abate by
May 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   (a)  At the facility, employees required to use a North 7700, half-face respirator with organic vapor cartridges had not received a medical evaluation.    (b)  At the facility, employees required to use a 3M half-face respirator with HEPA filters had not received a medical evaluation.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 1, 2014
Abate by
May 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  (a)  At the facility, employees required to use a North 7700, half-face respirator with organic vapor cartridges were not fit-tested.  (b)  At the facility, employees are required to use a 3M half-face respirator with HEPA filters were not fit-tested.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 1, 2014
Abate by
May 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:   (a) at the facility, the employer had not develope and implemented a written hazard communication program.   Employees use hazardous chemicals, such as but not limited to, tetrachloroehtylene.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.22 D01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Apr 1, 2014
Abate by
May 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1): On every building or other structure, or part thereof, used for mercantile, business, industrial or storage purposes, the loads approved by the building official were not marked on plates of approved design and securely affixed in a conspicuous place in each space to which they relate.   (a) Above the offices, the load approved by the building official for the overhead storage area was not marked with a plate.   (b) Above the bead blast room, the load approved by the building official for the overhead storage area was not marked with a plate.   (c) Above the employee restroom, the load approved by the building official for the overhead storage area was not marked with a plate.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339521452.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.