HOUSTON, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: FLEXBRITE, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of FLEXBRITE, INC. in 305 MCFARLAND ST., HOUSTON, TX 77011 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 339521452.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FLEXBRITE, INC.
- Site address
- 305 MCFARLAND ST.
- City
- HOUSTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77011
- Mailing
- 305 MCFARLAND ST., HOUSTON, TX 77011
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332812
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2014
- Abate by
- May 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use: (a) At the facility, employees are required to use a North 7700, half-face respirator with organic vapor cartridges when applyihg tetrachloride to parts to be vacuum coated. (b) At the facility, employees are required to use a 3M half-face respirator with HEPA filters when bead blasting with the enclosure door open.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2014
- Abate by
- May 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) At the facility, employees required to use a North 7700, half-face respirator with organic vapor cartridges had not received a medical evaluation. (b) At the facility, employees required to use a 3M half-face respirator with HEPA filters had not received a medical evaluation.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2014
- Abate by
- May 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: (a) At the facility, employees required to use a North 7700, half-face respirator with organic vapor cartridges were not fit-tested. (b) At the facility, employees are required to use a 3M half-face respirator with HEPA filters were not fit-tested.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2014
- Abate by
- May 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) at the facility, the employer had not develope and implemented a written hazard communication program. Employees use hazardous chemicals, such as but not limited to, tetrachloroehtylene.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.22 D01
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2014
- Abate by
- May 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1): On every building or other structure, or part thereof, used for mercantile, business, industrial or storage purposes, the loads approved by the building official were not marked on plates of approved design and securely affixed in a conspicuous place in each space to which they relate. (a) Above the offices, the load approved by the building official for the overhead storage area was not marked with a plate. (b) Above the bead blast room, the load approved by the building official for the overhead storage area was not marked with a plate. (c) Above the employee restroom, the load approved by the building official for the overhead storage area was not marked with a plate.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332812)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339521452.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.