Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: GARLOCK'S AUTO INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GARLOCK'S AUTO INC. in 2350 MARYLAND AVENUE, NIAGARA FALLS, NY 14304 (NAICS 423930). OSHA activity number 339521890.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Garlock'S Auto INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Garlock'S Auto INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GARLOCK'S AUTO INC.
Site address
2350 MARYLAND AVENUE
City
NIAGARA FALLS
State
NY
ZIP
14304
Mailing
2350 MARYLAND AVENUE, NIAGARA FALLS, NY 14304
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423930
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2014
Abate by
Jul 16, 2014
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  a)  On or about June 11, 2014; the employer failed to certify to OSHA (the Agency) that Citation 1, Item 1c and Citation 2, Items 2 and 3, of inspection 952189, were abated.  Abatement certification was due not later than 2/24/2014.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $400

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 14, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:    a) Facility - On or about 12/16/13, the employer did not provide chemical resistant gloves for the employees who are exposed to battery acid, fluids, solvents and gasoline.    b) Facility - On or about 12/16/13, the employer did not provide the correct ANSI-approved protective eyewear to use when they exposed to projectiles including metal particles when operating a sawz-all saw to cut metal and when exposed to splashes of battery acid.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $800
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.133 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 14, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  a) Facility - On or about 12/16/13, employee use sawzalls and grinders to remove parts from salvaged vehicles; and handle and remove batteries with aicd.  The employer does not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles; molten metal; liquid chemicals; acids or caustic liquids; chemcial gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  Employees either had no safety glasses or did not have a pair of ANSI-approved safety glasses with side shields, rather they were wearing "ski glasses" as their safety glasses.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 14, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes.  a) Facility - on or about 12/16/13, on up to a daily basis, employee work with a variety of chemcials, including battery acid, lubricants, gasoline, hydraulic oils, etc.  The employer has not selected and require the employees to use the appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cut or lacerations; severe abrasion' punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes.  Employees had only leather or cloth work gloves: no chemical resistant gloves were provided, required or used.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 14, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  a.) Facility - On or about 12/16/13, employee(s) use the Caterpiller C 930 wheel loader to move vehicles and equipment into and throughout the facility.  There has not been refresher training provided to those employee(s) operating the equipment within the last three years.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.22 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 14, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition.  a.) Facility - 2350 & 2340 Maryland Avenue - the reception area, office area, employee break room and storage rooms of the primary building (2350 Maryland Avenue) were not kept in a clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition: a variety of materials were staged on the floors and on and walking working surfaces.  Wires, tubing, tires, containers of fluids, and a variety of car and other parts and equipment impeded navigation through these areas, despite a narrow pathway.  The storage room/areas in both the primary building and the secondary building (2350 Maryland Avenue) had materials on the walking-working areas.   ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.141 C01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 14, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.141(c)(1)(i): Toilet facilities were not provided in accordance with TABLE J-1 of this Section:  (a) Facility - 2350 and 2340 Maryland Avenue - The employer did not provide a functional toilet facility in a building with heat and light for the employees to use.  In the alternative, when on-site facilities were not available, the employer had not made alternative options, such as coordinating with a near-by business to accomodate the employees when needed.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.141 D02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 14, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.141(d)(2)(i): Lavatory(s) were not made available:  a.) Facility - On or about 12/16/13, the employer does not make lavatories available to the employees.  Employees work with a variety of chemicals, such as but not limited to gasoline, brake fluids, antifreeze, transmission fluids, and battery acid.  The employer does not have a lavatory available, with running tepid water, soap and towels for employees to wash their hands.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Garlock'S Auto INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339521890.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.