Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: GRASSWORX, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GRASSWORX, LLC in 2381 CENTERLINE INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63146 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 339522237.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Grassworx, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Grassworx, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GRASSWORX, LLC
Site address
2381 CENTERLINE INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
City
SAINT LOUIS
State
MO
ZIP
63146
Mailing
2381 CENTERLINE INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63146
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
37
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.133 A03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,575 · Current $1,103 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(3): 29 CFR 1910.133(a)(3): The employer did not provide protective eyewear for employees who required prescription glasses:    A Finish Line Laborer requiring prescription glasses was not provided with protective eyewear to protect against injuries to the eyes from physical and chemical hazards in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1102.5
  • · Z (S) $1575

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,575 · Current $1,103 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc.:    a)  The rotating gearbox shaft of the G2 Blue Extruder did not have a guard to protect workers from contact with the rotating shaft as they stand in between the pellet tote and the G2 Blue Extruder to vacuum pellets from the bottom of the tote.    b)  The adjustable guards of the two EZ Rider, model number 1650-03, card attachment machines were affixed in the elevated position which not adequately protect the operator from the attachment needle point of operation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1102.5
  • · Z (S) $1575

1910.1200 F06 II

Other-than-serious 6 instances 16 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,575 · Current $1,103 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii)  Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical:    a)  In the Glue area, five application containers of Cyanoacrylate Adhesive which are used daily were not labeled with identity or hazard warning.  b)  In the Glue area, one spay bottle container of Quick Tac 2 Accelerator was not labeled with identity or hazard warning.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1102.5
  • · Z (S) $1575

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 37 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): Employee training did not include the details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labeling system and the safety data sheet, and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:    The employer did not train workers on the chemical labeling elements and safety data sheet format of the revised hazard communication standard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1904.31 A

Other-than-serious 3 instances 16 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2014
Abate by
Apr 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $525 · Current $368 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.31(a): Recordable injuries and illnesses of all employees on your payroll, whether they are labor, executive, hourly, salary, part time, seasonal, migrant workers, and those employees who are not on your payroll, but supervised by you on a day-to-day basis were not recorded on the OSHA 300 Log:    Recordable injuries and illnesses of all temporary employees supervised on a day-to-day basis by GrassWorx, LLC were not recorded on the OSHA 300 Log.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $367.5
  • · Z (O) $525

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339522237.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.