Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: FAX CARGO SERVICE

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FAX CARGO SERVICE in TAFUNA AIRPORT, AIRPORT ROAD, PAGO PAGO, AS 96799 (NAICS 484122). OSHA activity number 339523383.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch FAX Cargo Service for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for FAX Cargo Service is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FAX CARGO SERVICE
Site address
TAFUNA AIRPORT, AIRPORT ROAD
City
PAGO PAGO
State
AS
ZIP
96799
Mailing
PO BOX 825, PAGO PAGO, AS 96799
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
484122
Employees
14
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.157 G02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage firefighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter:      This violation was discovered on November 29, 2013; where employees were not provided training on the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $900
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.178 L06

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):      This violation was discovered on November 29, 2013; where employees operated powered industrial trucks without completing the required training and or evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.178 M05 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(5)(iii): Powered industrial truck(s), with the operator dismounted and within 25 feet of the truck still in his view, did not have the load engaging means fully lowered, controls neutralized, and the brakes set to prevent movement:    This violation was discovered on November 29, 2013; where the forklift was parked and operator left but the hand brake had not been set to prevent movement of the equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s):   This violation was discovered on November 29, 2013; where the Toyota forklift seat belt was defective/inoperable and the equipment was not taken out of service.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.305 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(d)(2): Panelboards were not mounted in cabinets, cutout boxes, or enclosures designed for the purpose and/or were not dead front:      This violation was discovered on November 29, 2013; where the circuit breaker panel was not provided with a cover exposing employees to live wires and arc flash hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:      This violation was discovered on November 29, 2013; where a written hazard communication program was not developed for hazardous materials in the shop such as, but not limited to ACE Rust Stop spray cans, aluminum 1 gallon Devoe paints, WD40 spray cans, oil based enamel and primer, gasoline and diesel. The hazard communication must also include a list of all the hazard chemicals and the material safety sheet for each chemical on the list.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $600
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.141 D02 IV

Other-than-serious 2 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.141(d)(2)(iv): Lavatories were not provided with individual hand towels or sections thereof, of cloth or paper, warm air blowers or clean individual sections of continuous cloth toweling:  This violation was discovered on November 29, 2013; where clean individual hand towels, cloth or paper towels were not provided to dry the hands in the lavatories.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.157 E03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check:   This violation was discovered on November 29, 2013; where a fire extinguisher onsite had not received annual maintenance inspection/service.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View FAX Cargo Service's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339523383.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.