PAGO PAGO, AS ·
OSHA Inspection: FAX CARGO SERVICE
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FAX CARGO SERVICE in TAFUNA AIRPORT, AIRPORT ROAD, PAGO PAGO, AS 96799 (NAICS 484122). OSHA activity number 339523383.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FAX CARGO SERVICE
- Site address
- TAFUNA AIRPORT, AIRPORT ROAD
- City
- PAGO PAGO
- State
- AS
- ZIP
- 96799
- Mailing
- PO BOX 825, PAGO PAGO, AS 96799
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 484122
- Employees
- 14
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.157 G02
- Issued
- Feb 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage firefighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter: This violation was discovered on November 29, 2013; where employees were not provided training on the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $900
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Feb 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l): This violation was discovered on November 29, 2013; where employees operated powered industrial trucks without completing the required training and or evaluation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.178 M05 III
- Issued
- Feb 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(5)(iii): Powered industrial truck(s), with the operator dismounted and within 25 feet of the truck still in his view, did not have the load engaging means fully lowered, controls neutralized, and the brakes set to prevent movement: This violation was discovered on November 29, 2013; where the forklift was parked and operator left but the hand brake had not been set to prevent movement of the equipment.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Feb 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s): This violation was discovered on November 29, 2013; where the Toyota forklift seat belt was defective/inoperable and the equipment was not taken out of service.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.305 D02
- Issued
- Feb 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(d)(2): Panelboards were not mounted in cabinets, cutout boxes, or enclosures designed for the purpose and/or were not dead front: This violation was discovered on November 29, 2013; where the circuit breaker panel was not provided with a cover exposing employees to live wires and arc flash hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Feb 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: This violation was discovered on November 29, 2013; where a written hazard communication program was not developed for hazardous materials in the shop such as, but not limited to ACE Rust Stop spray cans, aluminum 1 gallon Devoe paints, WD40 spray cans, oil based enamel and primer, gasoline and diesel. The hazard communication must also include a list of all the hazard chemicals and the material safety sheet for each chemical on the list.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $600
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.141 D02 IV
- Issued
- Feb 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.141(d)(2)(iv): Lavatories were not provided with individual hand towels or sections thereof, of cloth or paper, warm air blowers or clean individual sections of continuous cloth toweling: This violation was discovered on November 29, 2013; where clean individual hand towels, cloth or paper towels were not provided to dry the hands in the lavatories.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.157 E03
- Issued
- Feb 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check: This violation was discovered on November 29, 2013; where a fire extinguisher onsite had not received annual maintenance inspection/service.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at FAX Cargo Service
View FAX Cargo Service's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 484122)
More inspections in AS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339523383.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.