Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ERNESTO MARTINEZ CONSTRUCTION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ERNESTO MARTINEZ CONSTRUCTION in 5155 BUEHLERS DR., MEDINA, OH 44256 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339526667.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ernesto Martinez Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ernesto Martinez Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5155 BUEHLERS DR.
City
MEDINA
State
OH
ZIP
44256
Mailing
4039 RANDELL RD., COLUMBUS, OH 43228
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 6 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 29, 2014
Abate by
Dec 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:  (a)  The employer failed to provide documentation demonstrating the abatement methods and completion as cited in Citation 1 Item 3(a) for hazards associated with not developing a written hazard communication program;  (b)  The employer failed to provide documentation demonstrating the abatement methods and completion as cited in Citation 1 Item 3(b) for hazards associated with training employees on the hazardous chemicals in their workplace;  (c)  The employer failed to provide documentation demonstrating the abatement methods and completion as cited in Citation 2, Item 1(a) for hazards associated with not establishing a written respiratory protection program;  (d)  The employer failed to provide documentation demonstrating the abatement methods and completion as cited in Citation 2, Item 1(b) for hazards associated with not providing medical evaluations for employees required to wear tight-fitting half-face respirators;  (e)  The employer failed to provide documentation demonstrating the abatement methods and completion as cited in Citation 2, Item 1(c) for not fit testing employees required to wear tight-fitting half-face respirators;  (f)  The employer failed to provide documentation demonstrating the abatement methods and completion as cited in Citation 2, Item 1(d) for hazards associated with not providing respiratory protection training to employees required to wear tight-fitting half-face respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1926.451 C02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(iv): Front-end loaders and similar pieces of equipment were used to support scaffold platforms when they were not specifically designed by the manufacturer for such use:       Employee were exposed to a fall hazard of by accessing scaffolding (which was approximately 9 (+) ft., from the top of the scaffold to ground level) using the forks of a boom extension on a rough terrain fork-truck and the fork platform. The work platform was made by using a pallet attached to forks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 C02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): Fork-lifts were used to support scaffold platforms while the entire platform was not attached to the fork and the fork-lift was moved horizontally while the platform was occupied:      On or about 12/11/2013, the work platform made by using a pallet attached to forks, was not approved for this piece of equipment or secured the platform.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2014
Abate by
Mar 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:     The employer did not develop, implement, or maintain a written hazard communication program at the site. Chemicals used at the site include, but are not limited to, prepackaged concrete and mortar mixture.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2014
Abate by
Mar 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2) and (3) on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into their work area:      Employees were not trained on the hazardous chemicals introduced into the workplace. Chemicals include, but are not limited to, pre-packaged concrete and mortar mixture.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2014
Abate by
Mar 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with work-site specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (Construction Reference 1926.103)     As of 12/11/2013, the employer did not establish a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear tight-fitting half-face respirators (dust-mask) when mixing prepackaged concrete and mortar mixture.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2014
Abate by
Mar 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:     On and before 12/11/2013, the employer did not provide medical evaluations for employees required to wear tight-fitting half-face respirators when mixing prepackaged concrete and mortar mixture.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2014
Abate by
Mar 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employees using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator pass an appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT) as stated in this paragraph:     The employer did not fit test employees required to wear tight-fitting half-face respirators when mixing prepackaged concrete and mortar mixture.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2014
Abate by
Mar 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide respirator training that would ensure each employee could demonstrate knowledge of items in section (i)-(vii):      As of 12/11/2013 the employer did provide respiratory protection training to employees required to wear tight-fitting half-face respirators (dust-mask) when mixing prepackaged concrete and mortar mixture.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339526667.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.