Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,473Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-28 Last loaded 2026-07-31

OSHA Inspection: HEARTLAND OF BECKLEY WV, LLC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of HEARTLAND OF BECKLEY WV, LLC in 100 HEARTLAND DRIVE, BECKLEY, WV 25801 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 339527434.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Heartland of Beckley WV, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Heartland of Beckley WV, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
100 HEARTLAND DRIVE
City
BECKLEY
State
WV
ZIP
25801
Mailing
100 HEARTLAND DRIVE, BECKLEY, WV 25801
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
623110
Employees
195
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.151 C

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:   (a)  A-Wing:  An eyewash facility was not provided for immediate use for employees that change containers of corrosive concentrated cleaning solutions at a housekeeping dispenser station as documented on December 19, 2013.   (b)  G-Wing:  An eyewash facility was not provided for immediate use for employees that change containers of corrosive concentrated cleaning solutions at a housekeeping dispenser station as documented on December 19, 2013.  ABATEMENT CERIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $4000
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.132 D01 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2014
Abate by
Feb 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(i): The employer did not select and have each affected employee use the types of personal protective equipment that would protect the affected employee(s) from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment:    (a)  A-Wing:  Employees were not required to wear the Personal Protective Equipment identified in the PPE assessment such as chemical goggles and rubber utility gloves when changing containers of corrosive concentrated cleaning solutions at a housekeeping dispenser station as documented on December 19, 2013.     (b)  G-Wing:  Employees were not required to wear the Personal Protective Equipment identified in the PPE assessment such as chemical goggles and rubber utility gloves when changing containers of corrosive concentrated cleaning solutions at a housekeeping dispenser station as documented on December 19, 2013.    ABATEMENT CERIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2000
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2014
Abate by
Jun 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:    (a)  Site wide:  Employees use hazardous chemicals including, but not limited to, corrosive cleaning concentrates and as of December 1, 2013 the employees had not been through training on the new labeling and safety data sheet format required by this section as determined on January 2, 2014.     ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1904.40 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 195 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2014
Abate by
Feb 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1904.40(a): The employer did not provide an authorized government representative the records within the four business hours:  (a)  Beckley, WV Site:  As of January 3, 2014 the employer failed to provide a copy of the 2013 OSHA-300 log when requested by an OSHA compliance officer on December 19, 2013.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339527434.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.