TEANECK, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: STORMSPROOF INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of STORMSPROOF INC. in 264 HERRICK AVENUE, TEANECK, NJ 07666 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339528408.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- STORMSPROOF INC.
- Site address
- 264 HERRICK AVENUE
- City
- TEANECK
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07666
- Mailing
- 18 KEMPSHALL PLACE, ELIZABETH, NJ 07208
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 20, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees due to a fall from an elevation. A) Front roof of House - NJ: An employee was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 17 feet as he was using a material hoist as a ladder for access, on or about October 31st, 2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Feb 20, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: A) Roof of house: Employees were exposed to head injuries while working below roofing activities. The employees were not protected by hard hats or protective helmets, on or about October 31st, 2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Feb 20, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level. A) Scaffold / left side of house - An employee was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 13 feet while working on a ladder jack scaffold that was not protected by a complete guardrail system or other means of fall protection in place, on or about October 31st, 2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Feb 20, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): A) Front roof of house: Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 17 feet while engaged in roofing work on a residential structure. The exposed employees were not protected by any type of fall protection system, on or about October 31st, 2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Feb 20, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: A) Front roof of house: Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 17 feet while using an extension ladder to access the roof of a structure. The extension ladder that was used did not extend at least 3 feet above the landing, on or about October 31st, 2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections at Stormsproof INC.
View Stormsproof INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339528408.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.