Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BURLINGTON RIVER TERMINAL, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of BURLINGTON RIVER TERMINAL, INC. in 500 CASH STREET, BURLINGTON, IA 52601 (NAICS 488320). OSHA activity number 339529406.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Burlington River Terminal, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Burlington River Terminal, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
500 CASH STREET
City
BURLINGTON
State
IA
ZIP
52601
Mailing
PO BOX 884, BURLINGTON, IA 52601
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
488320
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.303 B07 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 29, 2014
Abate by
May 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(iv): There were damaged parts that may adversely affect safe operation or mechanical strength of electric equipment, such as parts that were broken, bent, cut or deteriorated by corrosion, chemical action, or overheating:  (a) In the main warehouse truck loadout, on the exterior wall, a weather proof outlet box was broken and missing the front enclosure listed for that purpose exposing the outlet to damp atmosphere.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.305 B02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 29, 2014
Abate by
May 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Each outlet box in completed installations did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy:   (a) In the main office and scale area, two duplex outlets had missing cover plates.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

1917.112 A02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 29, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1917.112(a)(2): Vehicle curbs, bull rails, or other effective barriers at least 6 inches in height were not provided at the edge of any fixed level from which vehicles may fall, except at loading docks, platforms and skids where cargo is moved by vehicles:  (a) At the Main Warehouse truck terminal, there was no effective barrier at the edge of a pit near the truck loadout conveyor where employees operating Kowasaki end loaders nearby could fall.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1960
  • — Z (S) $2800

1917.112 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 29, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $952 Reduced
29 CFR 1917.112(b)(1): Guardrails were not provided at locations where employees were exposed to floor or wall openings or waterside edges, including bridges or gangway-like structures leading to pilings or vessel mooring or berthing installations, which presented a hazard of falling more than 4 feet or into the water:  (a) At the barge terminal, guardrail for the conveyor walkway was deficient in that the railing left a 7" gap where employees could fall.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $952
  • — Z (S) $1360

1917.112 C05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 29, 2014
Abate by
May 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1917.112(c)(5): Top rails of guardrails were not free of puncture and laceration hazards.:  (a) At the barge terminal, a guardrail for the conveyor walkway was deficient in that the railing near the head was not smooth and had two small gaps where employees could catch their hands.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1917.118 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 29, 2014
Abate by
Jun 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1917.118(c)(1): Ladders with broken, split or missing rungs, steps or rails, broken welds on connections, corrosion or wastage, or other defect which may have affected safe use were not removed from service:  (a) At the barge terminal, the fixed ladder to access the conveyor walkway was deficient in that the side rails were bent and the rungs were bent creating an approximately 47 inch high fall hazard for employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1917.118 D02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 29, 2014
Abate by
Jun 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1917.118(d)(2)(i): Rungs on ladders installed before October 3, 1983, were not evenly spaced from 9 to 16½ inches apart, center to center:  (a) At the barge terminal, the fixed ladder to access the conveyor walkway did not have evenly spaced rungs.  The distance between the rungs were approximately 15", 14", 12" and 5" to walkway respectively creating a fall hazard for employees.  IN THE ALTERNATIVE:  29 CFR 1917.118(d)(2)(ii): Rungs on ladders, installed after October 3, 1983, were not evenly spaced from 12 ± 2 inches apart, center to center:  (a) At the barge terminal, the fixed ladder to access the conveyor walkway did not have evenly spaced rungs. The distance between the rungs were approximately 15", 14", 12" and 5" to walkway respectively creating a fall hazard for employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1917.118 D06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 29, 2014
Abate by
Jun 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1917.118(d)(6): The side rails of ladders did not extend at least 36 inches above the top landing surface nor were grab bars provided:  (a) At the barge terminal, the fixed ladder to access the conveyor walkway did not extend at least 36 inches above the landing surface nor were grab bars or equivalent holds provided creating a fall hazard of approximately 48 inches for employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1917.152 D01 XVI

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 29, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,190 Reduced
29 CFR 1917.152(d)(1)(xvi): Oxygen cylinders were not separated from fuel gas cylinders and combustible materials by either a minimum distance of 20 feet (6.1 m) or a barrier having a fire-resistance rating of 30 minutes:  (a)  In the maintenance shop, the oxygen cylinders were not separated from fuel-gas or acetylene cylinders and were within approximately 3 feet of the acetylene cylinders.  There was no barrier between the cylinders.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1190
  • — Z (S) $1700

1917.152 D05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 29, 2014
Abate by
May 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1917.152(d)(5): Pressure regulators, including associated gauges, were not maintained in safe working order:  (a)  In the maintenance shop, the regulator on the welder unit had a regulator pressure gauge that was missing the cover glass affecting proper operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

View Burlington River Terminal, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339529406.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.