OSHA Inspection: PURE'S FOOD SPECIALTIES, INC.

Issued

Mar 24, 2014

Abate by

Aug 8, 2014

Penalty

Initial $4,900 · Current $2,500 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    a. Entire facility - On or about December 30, 2013, the employer had not implemented an adequate energy control program for employees who perform servicing and maintenance on such equipment including but not limited to, air compressors, ovens, conveyors, mixers, baggers and weight scales.  Employees were thereby exposed to the hazards associated with the unexpected energization of equipment.

Issued

Mar 24, 2014

Penalty

Initial $4,900 · Current $1,000 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1): Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:    a. Silo Room - On or about December 30, 2013, live electrical conductors (120-240V) powering a mixer were unguarded thereby exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.

Issued

Mar 24, 2014

Abate by

Jun 30, 2014

Penalty

Initial $4,900 · Current $2,500 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments:    a. Facility - On or about December 30, 2013, employees required to perform voltage testing (110- 240V) on such equipment but not limited to motors, ovens, mixers, and baggers were not provided with training in the safety related work practices emphasized in 29 CFR 1910.331 - 1910.335.  The employees were thereby exposed to hazards of electrical shock and arc flash/blasts.

Issued

Mar 24, 2014

Abate by

Jun 30, 2014

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2)(i): The employer did not make a written copy of the procedures outlined in paragraph (b)(2) of 29 CFR 1910.333 available for inspection by employees and by the Assistant Secretary of Labor and his or her authorized representatives:    a. Facility - On or about November 15, 2013, the employer did not maintain written electrical safety-related work practice procedures outlined in 29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2) for employees who are required to perform voltage testing (110- 240V) on such equipment but not limited to motors, ovens, mixers, and baggers.

Issued

Mar 24, 2014

Abate by

Jun 30, 2014

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not using electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed:    a. Facility - On or about December 30, 2013, employees were required to perform voltage testing (110- 240V) on such equipment but not limited to motors, ovens, mixers, and baggers. The employees were not provided with electrical protective equipment including but not limited to fire retardant clothing, hard hat, face shield, and adequate voltage rated gloves.  The employees were thereby exposed to hazards of electrical shock and arc flash/blasts.

Issued

Mar 24, 2014

Abate by

Jun 30, 2014

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.335(a)(2)(i): When working near exposed energized conductors or circuit parts, each employee did not use insulated tools or handling equipment when the tools or handling equipment might have made contact with such conductors or parts:    a. Facility - On or about December 30, 2013, employees were required to perform voltage testing (110- 240V) on such equipment but not limited to motors, ovens, mixers, and baggers.  The employees were not provided with insulated tools and were thereby exposed to the hazards of electrical shock and arc flash/blasts.

Issued

Mar 24, 2014

Penalty

Initial $700 · Current $0 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1904.29(a): The employer did not use an OSHA 300, 301 and 300A Form or equivalent.    a. Facility - On or about December 30, 2013, the employer did not use OSHA 300 and 300-A forms, or equivalent forms for recordable injuries and illnesses that occurred during the past several years, including 2011 and year to date 2014.