BENBROOK, TX —
OSHA Inspection: JOAQUIN HERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOAQUIN HERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ in 8004 SOUTH ECHO HILLS COURT, BENBROOK, TX 76126 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339535742.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOAQUIN HERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ
- Site address
- 8004 SOUTH ECHO HILLS COURT
- City
- BENBROOK
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76126
- Mailing
- 1605 HERSHEL STREET, ARLINGTON, TX 76010
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jan 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $640 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: On or about December 31, 2013, employees performing framing work were not protected by a protective helmet while working underneath employees that were framing above at higher levels. The employees were exposed to being struck by objects and/or tools falling from a height greater than 25 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $640
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jan 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $640 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: On or about December 31, 2013, employees performing framing work using air nail guns and circular saws were not provided eye and face protection. Employees were exposed to eye and face injuries.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $640
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.307 D01
- Issued
- Jan 15, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 13, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $640 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.307(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet (2.128 m) or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in paragraphs (m) and (o) of this section: On or about December 31, 2013, the employer did not ensure that the belt of the unidentified air compressor was guarded. The employees were exposed to an ingoing nip point hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $640
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.403 B02
- Issued
- Jan 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification: On or about December 31, 2013, the employer did not ensure employees at a residential construction project were using electrical equipment as listed or labeled, as they were using a job made extension cord that was not provided with a cover or strain relief, exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.403 E
- Issued
- Jan 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(e): All splices and joints and free ends of conductors were not covered with insulation equivalent to that of the conductors or with an insulating device designed for the purpose: On or about December 31, 2013, the employer did not ensure an electrical cord used to supply power to a Makita circular saw was protected with its equivalent insulation where splice repairs had been made.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.405 G02 IV
- Issued
- Jan 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws: On or about December 31, 2013, employees at a residential construction project were performing framing work utilizing an extension cord to power a Makita Circular Saw that was not provided with strain relief and exposed them to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Joaquin Hernandez-Gonzalez
View Joaquin Hernandez-Gonzalez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339535742.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.