Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CL HAUTHAWAY

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of CL HAUTHAWAY in 638 SUMMER STREET, LYNN, MA 01905 (NAICS 325510). OSHA activity number 339537078.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch CL Hauthaway — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for CL Hauthaway is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CL HAUTHAWAY
Site address
638 SUMMER STREET
City
LYNN
State
MA
ZIP
01905
Mailing
638 SUMMER STREET, LYNN, MA 01905
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325510
Employees
40
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 E03 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2014
Abate by
May 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(iii): The process hazard analysis did not address engineering and administrative controls applicable to the hazards and their interrelationships such as appropriate application of detection methodologies to provide early warning of releases.    (a) Location - Reactor #6:  On or about 12/18/2013, the process hazard analysis did not address the hazards of static being generated while adding powders to a process tank that contained flammable liquids.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.119 F01 III B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2014
Abate by
May 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(iii)(B): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provided clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information which addressed precautions necessary to prevent exposure, including engineering controls, administrative controls, and personal protective equipment.    (a) Location: - Facility:   On or about 12/18/2013,  the employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provided clear instructions to address the hazards of static discharge generated by adding powders to a process tank that contained flammable liquids.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.119 G01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2014
Abate by
May 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(g)(1)(i): Each employee involved in operating a process was not trained in the safe work practices applicable to the employee's job tasks;     (a) Location - Reactor #6:  On or about 12/18/13, the employer did not train employees about how to safely add powders to a process tank that contained flammable liquids.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.178 M11

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(11): Only approved industrial trucks shall be used in hazardous locations.     (a) Location - Facility   On or about 12/18/2013, a LPS forklift was used in a Class, 1 Division 1, group location.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.119 D03 I E

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2014
Abate by
Jun 23, 2014
Penalty
Initial $9,800 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(E): Information pertaining to the equipment in the process did not include a ventilation system design.     (a) Location: Reactor #6:   On or about 12/18/2013, the ventilation system design did not account for the potential presence of combustible dust in the duct work.     C.L. Hauthaway was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(E), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 312792484, citation number 1, item number 7 and was affirmed as a final order on August 18, 2009, with respect to a workplace located at 638 Summer Street, Lynn, Massachusetts 01905.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (R) $9800

1910.119 D03 II

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2014
Abate by
May 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $9,800 · Current $6,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer shall document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.       (a) Location - Facility:     On or about 12/18/13, equipment that was covered by 29 CFR 1910.119 was not documented as compliant with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.     C.L. Hauthaway was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 312792484, citation number 1, item number 11 and was affirmed as a final order on August 18, 2009, with respect to a workplace located at 638 Summer Street, Lynn, Massachusetts 01905.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $6000
  • — Z (R) $9800

View CL Hauthaway's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339537078.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.